Another gullible person just died.

Leave a reply

Another FAFO happened. People are banging pots and pans together, giving those of us who like making fun of how ridiculous people can be plenty of material to work with.

What went down is that a woman was killed in Minnesota while resisting ICE officers. Her final mistake was accelerating towards an officer in her vehicle, ignoring repeated instruction to leave the vehicle. Recognizing this act of aggression as an attack with a 2-ton weapon, which was exactly what it was, the officer that was struck made it so that she’d never make another mistake.

And now, here we are, with millions of people who hate America and advocate for the rape of America telling you not to believe your lying eyes, because we have video of the incident from multiple different angles.

I’ll say first that nothing about this incident should really change your opinion of illegal immigration, whether you’re for it or against it. This incident pretty much came down to someone escalating matters beyond her ability to manage, then leaving the rest of us with a lesson to learn. A lesson that she herself doesn’t benefit from, because now she’s gone.

It’s wise to learn from your mistakes. It’s better to learn from other people’s mistakes.

The attacker was identified as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good. As is often the case when it comes to infamous criminals, her name is forfeit, and I get to give her a new one. Her new name is Renee Bad. She’s not around to enjoy it, so whether she would is irrelevant.

The 2:00 PM video from the post below is likely the one that you saw first, especially if you’re one of the few who are still informed by television.

The part that’s hyper-analyzed would be the 9 to 12 second portion, which shows that a federal agent was in front of the vehicle when Renee Bad shifted from reverse to forward (as indicated by the lights on her car changing), and she accelerated forward as the federal agent was still in front of her vehicle. The agent responded to this aggression by firing his pistol at the attacker.

Renee wasn’t using her head before, and now she definitely isn’t.

As we have seen in the last few days, leftists saw the video above, and saw something entirely different. In their thinking, the ICE agent was the clear aggressor, senselessly firing on a woman who was doing nothing wrong. Though we have the clear, plain video evidence, leftists still insist on their own manufactured reality, making this another case study in leftism being a carefully constructed denial of reality, a cult wherein each of the adherents prove their devotion to the ideology with how starkly they can deny the clear, plain evidence.

Again, nothing about this incident should have any bearing on policy regarding illegal immigration, other than in regards to the safety of agents carrying out their duties in an environment where they can be interfered with by violent cretins seeking social media headpats. The real problem is that protestors are becoming increasingly violent and then proceeding to play victim when facing the consequences for their own unwise behavior. Much of their behavior can likely be explained by them acting out encouraged by inflammatory rhetoric from social media influencers and those in the protestors’ online social circles. A stunted capacity for understanding right from wrong would easily explain the rest.

Much of online activism on the left comes down to trying to get other people to do things.

If you’re among the many who liked to lie to yourself about the video above, then the video below made it far more difficult for you to deceive yourself. It’s cell phone video from the ICE agent who was struck by the vehicle.

Prior to her decision to attack the ICE agent, Renee Bad was ordered to leave the vehicle by the officers a total of three times. At that point, it was already a non-compliance issue. Renee should not have been in her vehicle at the point that she decided to attack.

The video, taken from the perspective of the officer who was attacked, shows that he was in front of the vehicle at the point that Renee decided to accelerate. What’s more, you can hear a loud “thud” at the moment the vehicle collided with the agent.

There’s simply no room for denial.

But what I’d like to call attention to is the expression on Renee’s face right before she decided to accelerate towards the officer. The following image was taken from about 39 seconds into the video:

She’s looking right at the officer she was about to attempt to run down. And she had a big smile. She knew what she was about to do.

People have spoken of Renee Bad’s death as a tragedy. As I see it, the real tragedy occurred well before she decided that she’d be an activist instead of a mother that day. Over the course of an unknown amount of time, Renee was subjected to algorithmic manipulation and psychological operation which were so extensive, so corrosive and destructive, that it was able to override her better judgement. So effective was the emotionally loaded language, the one-sided arguments, and the deception that she was presented with, that she became a willing soldier for a people who weren’t her own, ready to literally fight in a war to continue a fraud that stole billions from people who actually were her own.

All this despite there being no benefit to her in persevering, whatsoever.

Some deaths are a tragedy. But sometimes, the world really is better off without certain people. And Renee was clearly one of those people. After all, what exactly was society supposed to do with someone who decided that, instead of caring for her family on a given day, she’d instead obstruct federal officers with a big smile, with apparently nothing to gain in so doing? And what kind of a future can a person be expected to have if they would decide that, instead of complying with law enforcement, she’d instead decide to attempt vehicular assault against them?

Could Renee have been redeemed? I don’t know. But if a person attacks a person who’s armed, especially if it’s law enforcement, with potentially lethal force, I doubt that redemption would be on that person’s mind.

I think it’s reasonable to guess that if she had survived that encounter, her life would have ended due to the consequences of a different unwise choice that she’d have made. With some people, it’s just a matter of time.

Speculation aside, Renee Bad is gone, now. The world has become slightly less stupid.

We should be angry right now.

Leave a reply

Be you.

No criminal record.
STEM major, because that seemed like the smart guy thing to do.
Graduated with honors.
Employed at production facility for a few years.
Makes just a couple more dollars per hour than someone who stocks grocery shelves nearby.
Goes home to a one-bedroom apartment in a car with mechanical problems.
Hasn’t been in a relationship in about a decade.
Tired of the same struggle meal that was had a few days in a row.
As far as you can tell, you did everything right.
The people on TV, social media, and in movies tell you that it’s somehow your fault, and that you deserve it, somehow.

Be Homer Simpson in the mid-nineties.

No college education.
Is a lowly nuclear power technician.
Has a wife and three children.
Lives in a house in a nice suburb, even the baby has her own bedroom.
Can afford to go on vacation three times a year.
Can buy new stuff like a grill anytime he wants.
Doesn’t seem to do anything right.
The entire point of his sitcom is that he’s a lower-middle-class loser.

Be some rando Somalian.

No education, period.
Goes to country that’s a better place because it’s not run like the shithole he’s from.
Rape was literally legal in his home country just five years ago.
Contributes literally nothing to society. Average IQ beneath legal threshold for being considered disabled.
Is paid millions of dollars by the government just for repeatedly showing up to an empty building with a misspelled day care sign.
Has a sports car and lives in a large lake front property.
His fraud is exposed, but there are Americans who are actually okay with it, for some reason.

I think it’s time we started having a conversation about what’s wrong with society.

Islam has a new most embarrassing story.

Leave a reply

If you love criticizing Islam to a pulp, Muhammad is the gift that just keeps right on giving. And today, we’re examining yet another story that Muslims are going to wish just wasn’t written into their official materials, so they wouldn’t have to do quite so much damage control for their false prophet.

If the name Muhammad rings a bell, you might remember him from such stories as the time he accepted the Quraysh bargain, selling out his own monotheistic god by attributing three daughters to him, then when he realized the blunder he made, he claimed that Satan made him say it, not knowing the optics of a prophet being made to say Satan’s words, or the time when he poopered a nine-year-old while he was in his fifties.

That Muhammad.

But before we get into today’s story, let’s first frame it with how Islam handles homosexuality. Relevance? Don’t worry, we’ll get to that.

“And Lot! (Remember) when he said unto his folk: Will ye commit abomination such as no creature ever did before you? Lo! ye come with lust unto men instead of women. Nay, but ye are wanton folk.”

-Quran 7:80-81

“WHEN A MAN MOUNTS ANOTHER MAN, THE THRONE OF ALLAH SHAKES”

-Hadith

“Do you approach the males of humanity, leaving the wives Allah has created for you? But you are a people who transgress”
-Quran 26:165-66

There are various Hadith which states, in addition to these things, that if males commit sodomy, they are to be put to death, both the one who commits the act and the one who passively allowed it to be committed upon him.

Nearly every single Islamic scholar has stated, in no uncertain terms, that homosexual acts are unIslamic, and affirm the penalty of death for those who commit them.

Now, with that framing out of the way, let’s move on to Islam’s new most embarrassing story, the encounter with the men of Al-Zutt.

The following is the full account. I’ll offer a synopsis afterwards.

Ibn Mas’ūd narrated :

The Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) performed ‘Ishā, then he turned and asked for me. He took my hand and we set out until I came to the wide valley of Makkah. He drew a line for me and said to me: ‘Stay within this line, and do not cross it, for indeed there shall come some men to you, but do not speak to them for they shall not speak to you, and if you cross (the line), you will perish. ‘ So I stayed within it. So the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) went on a little, as far as one could throw a stone or a little further.

While I was sitting within the line, some men/shapes of figures [i.e. jinn] came to me that appeared as if they were black people (i.e. dark people, like from North Africa or India), both their hair and bodies. They were not wearing any clothes but I could not see their private parts, and they were tall and they had little flesh (i.e. slim).

Then they returned towards Allāh’s Messenger (ﷺ) and began towering on top of the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ). The Prophet of Allāh (ﷺ) began to recite the Qur’ān to them. And they started coming to me and surrounding me, and getting in my way. I was extremely scared of them, so I sat down – or words to that effect.

When dawn entered, they started to leave. Then the Messenger of Allāh came and entered into the line with me, looking heavy and in pain, or almost like he was in pain from their towering over him. He (ﷺ) said:’I find myself tired’ – or words to that effect. So the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) placed his head on my lap to sleep. And the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) would snore when he slept.

While I was sitting there, after a while, these men came, wearing long white garments, and Allāh knows best how handsome they were. The Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) had gone to sleep. They came towards me – I was more afraid than I was the first time – a group of them sat at the head of the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) and a group at his feet. So some of them said to each other: This servant has been given good, his eyes are asleep, but his heart is awake.

Some of them said to one another: Come, let us give him a parable. Some of them said to one another: You coin for him a parable, and we will interpret it, or we will coin for him a parable and you will interpret it.

So some of them said to each other: His parable is that of a leader who built a fortified fort, then he placed a table-spread in it and he invites people to eat and drink. So whoever answers his invitation, he eats from his food and drinks from his drink. And whoever does not come and eat his food, or who does not answer his invitation, he will punish him with a severe punishment.

The others said: As for the leader, he is the Lord of the worlds, and as for the fort, it is Islām, and the food is Paradise, and he (the prophet) is the one who invites, so whoever follows him will be in Paradise. And whoever does not follow him will be punished.

Then the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ) woke up and said: ‘What did you see, Oh Ibn Umm ‘Abd?’ ‘Abdullāh said: I saw such-and-such. The Prophet (ﷺ) said: ‘Nothing of what they said was hidden from me.’ The Prophet of Allāh (ﷺ) said:’ They are a group of the angels.’ Or he said:’ They are the angels.’

Musnad Ahmad 3788

Muhammad and Ibn Masud went to a remote area, just the two of them. Muhammad drew a circle around Ibn Masud, telling him to stay within to avoid death. Then, a group of black men appeared (the men of Al-Zutt). They were tall, skinny, and naked, though Ibn Masud couldn’t see their genitals. They began “towering” over Muhammad, and Muhammad began reciting the Quran. When their attention turned towards Ibn Masud, he responded by sitting down.

After the men left, Muhammad returned to Ibn Masud weary and in pain by reason of what they had done to him (their “towering” over him). Muhammad fell asleep on his lap. The men briefly appeared in white clothes again, spoke to Ibn Masud (even though Muhammad had said that they would not), then they left again.

This account does bear dissecting, as it has faced some slight attempt to revise, probably because Muslims have come to understand just how embarrassing this account is, or at least it’s potential to be interpreted in an embarrassing manner.

For one thing, you might have noticed the word “jinn” in brackets. The brackets indicate an addition to attempt to either revise or to attempt to add clarity. One way or another, it contains an assumption that the revisionist wants you to come to. The popular interpretation is that these men were actually Jinn, as the interpretation of them as humans has a high potential to be interpreted in a manner that’s very embarrassing to Islam.

Yet, this interpretation is defeated by a simple observation: Jinn are supposed to be invisible. If the men were jinn, Ibn Masud should not have been able to see them. What’s more, because jinn are supposed to be demons, they should not have been able to directly interact with the natural world. From a Biblical perspective, the most that demons could do is mess with people’s minds.

And yet, not only were these men able to physically interact with Muhammad, whatever they did to him left him tired and in pain.

Now, let’s get to that. According to this translation, the men were “towering on top” of Muhammad. It was to the point that “he was in pain from their towering over him.” So, whatever it was they were doing, it involved physical contact, and was not just standing near him menacingly while being taller than him.

The “towering” comes from a word that could instead be translated “rode” or “mounted”. This is interesting, because like the latter two English equivalents, they could be interpreted to mean getting on top of someone to be carried by them, like a piggyback ride, or they could be interpreted as meaning a person attached themselves to someone else in a sexual sense.

Yeah, that could be very embarrassing for Muhammad, Islam, and many Muslims around the world.

If it weren’t already evident that the revisors are trying to hide something, the original was actually more specific than referring to the men as “black people”. They were “men of Al-Zutt”. While this phrase could refer to men of African ancestry, it was more commonly known to refer to men from North Indian and Pakistani origin.

The men of Al-Zutt were famed, not just for their dark skin, but also for their libidos. They were said to have immense sexual appetites and persistent erections. And these men were the ones who met with Muhammad. If not, then the original texts wouldn’t have told us as much. But they did, and now we see the Islamic world going into damage control.

Again.

Interestingly, when Ibn Masud felt intimidated by the men, he responded by planting his butt down on the ground.

As more and more about Muhammad comes to light, it’s becoming more and more difficult for a person to be a Muslim, because there’s more and more about Islam and Muhammad for non-Muslims to laugh at.

Muslims themselves have to start asking themselves just what it is that they’re clinging to. I mean, do they really believe this stuff?

Again, just what is it that Muslims are clinging to?

Islam has one prophet, and only one. He claimed to be the greatest and final prophet, though no Biblical prophet foretold him. He wallowed in decadence, and the violence he committed funded his lavish lifestyle. He performed no miracles. None of them. Absolutely none. Not only that, he said as much.

He made prophecies which failed to come true, including his famous Day of Doom prophecy, which was supposed to involve huge, dramatic events which would lead to the deaths of all non-Muslims. He stated that this was to occur within 500 years of his own lifetime. It’s been over 1400 years since, and Muhammad’s biggest and most important prophecy was just a big nothing burger.

He sold out his own monotheistic religion for the wealth offered by the Quraysh, then said that Satan made him accept after he realized the blunder he had made. He made claims about the beliefs of Christians and Jews, attributing these claims to his god, which Christians and Jews didn’t actually believe in. Jews don’t call Ezra the Messiah. Muhammad was dead wrong.

He claimed to receive a revelation affirming that he could be pleasured by his sex slaves if he wanted, even if his wives wanted attention, with Muslims having that detail of his life to study for ages to come. When he was in his fifties, he consummated a marriage with a girl whose age consisted of a single digit.

He didn’t know what the Scriptures said, because he couldn’t read. After someone read them to him, he repeated them back wrong. And after he was called out for it, he claimed that the Scriptures were all edited in a widespread and conspiratorial manner, including the ones he insisted were right immediately after they were read to him.

By saying that the Christian Gospels were the source of all wisdom, he inadvertently called his own Quran completely unnecessary. He claimed that if he was lying while serving in a prophetic capacity, then his aorta would be severed. Which is interesting, because he described the pain of his own death with the same language.

He failed to foresee his own poisoning by a Jewish woman, leading to his own slow, agonizing, miserable death by reason of the complications in the years to come. He attempted sorcery to try to keep himself from dying. He claimed to receive a revelation telling him that he would live, then died shortly afterwards. And because he failed to appoint a successor, the resulting infighting among those lusting for control over the empire resulted in a divide which continues to this day.

And on top of all this, Muhammad went to meet men of Al-Zutt, to be “mounted” by them to the point that he’d be exhausted and in pain. And he was a willing party to it, as evidenced by the fact that he went to that spot, suggesting that he knew what was coming.

For Muslims, this account of the men of Al-Zutt has to be like a bad memory, and a pain in the backside to explain. Because, what exactly are we supposed to come away from with this story? If we’re to accept that the men were demons, the implication that they’d have anything positive to say about the religion of Islam doesn’t make Islam or Muhammad look any better. Seriously, what kind of selling point is it that demons think your religion is great?

But if we were to take the account at face value, that Muhammad was “rode” by men famous for their sexual appetites, doesn’t that mean that Muhammad is condemned to death by his own religion?

Christians don’t have to deal with this kind of thing, because no account like this is anywhere in the Bible. So, how come it’s Islam that frequently finds itself going into damage control? After spending hours and hours researching different ways to translate and interpret different passages so they don’t look nearly as incriminating for Muhammad and Islam, one would think that Muslims would come to the conclusion that their prophet wasn’t worth believing in.

But now, here we are, with Muslims trying to explain away that their own prophet, the central prophet of their religion, might have actually willingly engaged in group sex with other men.

Score one more for those who think that the official Islamic materials were authored by hostile sources.

TWAT News: CNN and gambling.

Leave a reply

CNN is already famous for its journalistic integrity, so it’s natural to expect it to partner with prediction market website Kalshi.

If Kalshi sounds somewhat familiar, it’s probably because you’ve heard the name in passing when Polymarket was discussed.

Here’s Kalshi’s partnership announcement on X:

I like the term “prediction market”, by the way, because it’s a more Orwellian way of saying “gambling”.

Which I think gives us a pretty good understanding of how things are going for CNN after the abject failure of their streaming platform. They’re now partnering up with a gambling website.

Except, instead of a game of cards, the bets are on outcomes of current events such as elections. Which has lots of potential for a conflict of interest when you understand that CNN might report on an outcome that doesn’t fit the official narrative when there’s piles of their viewers’ money at stake.

We’re talking about the kind of people who went to school for years to become journalists only to end up writing articles like the kind touting cuckolding, if you’d trust their financial advise, you were probably going to lose that money somehow, anyway.

In case you’re wondering which of the two is on the bottom in the relationship, here’s a video of CNN with a scrolling Kalshi prediction tracker:

Simply pathetic.

At this point, it’s a valid question: Who the hell still watches CNN? My guess is that it’s the same credulous dimwits who heard the Russian collusion hoax, the Storm Daniels hush money story, and the Sandman defamation, and believed the people on their television screens without even the slightest trace of inquiry.

And now, CNN wants them to become addicted to gambling so they don’t lose the viewers that they have left.

Here’s the best take on this matter that I’ve seen that wasn’t one of my own:

Which gets me suspicious that insider trading may have just evolved into a form that gets around the law, at least for the time being.

But CNN has just partnered with a gambling website. That Was Actually The News.

Violent freak of current relevance just happened again.

Leave a reply

When you think of someone who would have no problem integrating, among the first people you think of would probably be someone who demonstrated his loyalty by working with American intelligence for a decade during a major conflict. If just such a guy doesn’t take to American life, then there’s not much expectation for anyone from his part of the world. And how dare you notice?

Pictured above is Rahmanullah Lakanwal, whose name sounds like a combination of anger-vomiting and the sound of ants chewing your ears.

Rjxejvlexvh Lrquxxql spent most of his life in Afghanistan, a place where pederasty is considered normal, which probably factored somehow into how he ended up in Washington state. As with many migrants, he was assumed to be a blank slate, capable of adapting to life in a completely different culture, but he was probably indemnified of all violent sexual offenses, just to be safe. All in the hope of a hypothetical scenario that he could become a contributor to the wealth of a large corporate entity which would pay him significantly less than a born American.

Rhg#&oo9’h Lufz3>*h became isolated and mentally ill to the point of being non-functional, and would frequently go on long car rides for no reason. So, so much for the whole dealie with him being a productive contributor, or anything to that effect. But hey, it’s not like he was some homicidal maniac, right?

On November 26, 2025, after a long car ride from Washington state to Washington DC, Rherph Lderph opened fire, fatally injuring one deputized national guardsman, and injuring another. While he might have hoped to have met 72 virgin goats, he was instead shot then captured alive, and presumably treated for his own wound, before being fitted with a turtle apron and given a copy of the Quran so he can brush up on that religion that made his life suck so hard.

Reactions to the attack have been mixed. Those on the left face the daunting task of presenting the situation in a way that doesn’t make their own pet policies look bad, while the right basically just told us what happened.

While the attack can be viewed as the tragic outcome of a psychotic break from reality, it does present us with yet another talking point for the culture realists. That is to say, it really is a great idea for the western world to discuss just how unreasonable it is to expect people from radically different cultures to integrate into the civilized world.

In the case of Rtthgrrmh L00flgrll, he is from Afghanistan. Not only is child marriage considered normal there, it’s a place where effeminate boys are groomed for trafficking to affluent men, in spite of Islam’s prohibition on homosexuality (the men reason this away by telling themselves that it’s not homosexuality if they don’t love the boys being trafficked). Not only that, it’s a place where the gang rape of boys by other boys is more common than it should be.

If you can be aware of all this and still believe that anyone from Afghan culture should be brought into the civilized world, then you are too stupid to chew your own food.

The fact is, not every culture is the same. There are cultures where, if a person comes out of it, there’s no realistic expectation that they’ll be able to integrate elsewhere.

The propagation of the idea of the blank slate has been dangerously irresponsible. Not only that, there’s the idea that our own values are universal. Both ideas are out of touch with reality, and when they’re used to justify policy, people are put at risk.

Back to R!*%@^$h L*#!^*^#h. Adding to the poor optics of his attack is the fact that National Guardsman in DC were attacked, which was guaranteed to get a strong reaction out of the Trump administration. And Trump responded by declaring his intention of halting all migration into the US from the third world.

Which was probably not the kind of thing that R________h L_________h would have wanted. The fact is, people don’t respond to terrorism with fear the way that people might expect. Instead, people get pissed off. Terrorism just isn’t an effective tactic, anymore.

But then, people who attempt terrorism aren’t reasonable people. And because they’re not reasonable, you’re better off not having them around.

Did Mike Judge try to warn us?

Leave a reply

As hard as it may be to believe, the nineties MTV cartoon Beavis and Butthead actually had a point. That point being, that watching too much TV could make you stupid.

As we examine today’s story, I think it will become apparent why this came to mind.

Two Texas men, by the name of Gavin Weisenburg and Tanner Thomas, were both arrested after they had planned an invasion of an African island, with the intention of killing all the men on the island, and turning all the women and children into their sex slaves.

That was already a mouthful. And yet, there’s still more to unpack.

As part of their plan, the two studied Haitian Creole, researched firearms and the means to transport them, and joined the Air Force with the intention of attaining tactical knowledge. One of them is accused of spending time in Thailand to learn to commandeer a boat in preparation for their mission.

The two would transfer to an air base near DC, where the two would attempt to recruit homeless people for their invasion.

Crossing the Atlantic with an army of stoner dipshits? What can go wrong?

For one thing, they got caught. Because that’s how it went down, they now face potential life imprisonment, and possibly up to 30 more years for a charge of generating Cheese Pizza.

But what could have happened is that they could have attempted the trip, and the sea itself could’ve kicked their asses. A trip across the Atlantic by boat is no joke. Especially with hurricanes.

Finally, and worst for them, they could’ve actually arrived on the island, and promptly got their asses beat by the island’s 87000 inhabitants.

Wowee, there’s so much to this story that’s hard to believe. For one thing, that there was one person who had the idea to invade an island to turn it’s entire female population into their personal harem. But what’s more, that there were two such people, and they somehow found each other.

What’s more, I thought that the US armed forces turned people away if their IQs were less than 82. But not only did Beavis and Butthead join, they got into the Air Force, which is supposed to be where the smart boys end up.

Third, I act under the assumption that even ordinary US citizens are under surveillance, though I wish that that wasn’t the case. How is it that these two were actually in the government (by virtue of being in the armed forces) and their plan got as far as it did?

Then there’s the apparent assumption that the international community would just turn a blind eye to a gaggle of American stoners invading Africa. Did these two really think their plan would prosper in the long run, or even come anywhere close to working?

I don’t know, but I get the idea that Mike Judge tried to warn us.

It’s now hunting season.

Leave a reply

Last week, a new feature was implemented on X, which allows us to see the locations where various accounts have been created. With this, many, many foreign actors have been exposed as attempting to influence American politics.

You love to see it.

As I’ve pointed out before, someone isn’t from the same country as you just because they post in the same language.

This development would’ve been better about two years ago, before a gaggle of foreign influencers hacked the brains of millions of gullible zoomers into supporting a long-known terrorist organization. But now, we get to watch them squirm as they realize how stupid they really are.

I’ve selected a few “hello fellow children” accounts, towards which we can now direct a hearty Nelson laugh.

fUSTED as Buck.

By the way, many of those exposed have responded by deleting their accounts. Many of which were Indian bots. Indian as in from India, not native American.

Still, posing as disgruntled native Americans is a recurring theme among those wishing to influence American politics.

In fact, one guy collected a few Bangladeshi examples:

I wonder how many of them are the same guy. Sock Puppet Theater!

So, who’s exposed now?

You know you’ve been hearing that nearly all anti-Jewish, anti-Israel content is from Muslim majority countries? That’s because that’s just what’s going on.

Another “hello fellow Americans, I’m just like you” account that turned out to be some guy in Saudi Arabia.

This one is from Azerbaijan. Many such cases.

By the way, see the shield next to the location data? This indicates the possible use of a VPN, sometimes as a feature of a browser or ISP, and not necessarily intended to be used by the account creator. So there could be false positives.

Look, a Canadian telling us which presidential candidate they intend to vote for in the US election. If they actually did, I wouldn’t be surprised.

Gather around! Some guy from the Phillipines has something to say about Jewish statehood!

Today has been an unmitigated win for the Zionist conspiracy.

1776General_ was a massive groyper chud who, as it turns out, lives in Turkey.

I wonder just how much of Nick Fuentes’ audience was just outed as not being very “America first” at all. Probably nearly 100%.

In fact, many a community is finding something out about their haters:

There’s more. Much more. So I’ll just leave this post with this:

EDIT: There is a fake screen going around showing the US DHS as being run from Israel. But here is what you find if you check the DHS account on X:

If someone’s bullshit is easy to disprove in mere seconds, then just who are they trying to fool? It’s no surprise that the anti-Israel crowd isn’t terribly bright, but it’s as though they are trying to cultivate a following of credulous halfwits.

More people should be talking about this.

Leave a reply

There was a House vote last week over condemning socialism. What does it do? From what I can tell, pretty much nothing, except condemn socialism.

It’s been made out to be a virtue signal by the right, but I think this reveals something significant, which I’ll get into.

You can see the results in the graphic above. What we see out of Republicans isn’t very surprising. Aside from the few who didn’t vote, their condemnation was unanimous. Republicans tend towards limited government and the free market, and it’s great to see them consistent with themselves in this regard.

But let’s get into something concerning that the vote reveals. Democrats should have also been unanimous in their condemnation of socialism. But they were split, nearly half-and-half.

The reason this is sobering is because Socialism is a heavily statist government philosophy which masquerades as an economic theory. It, along with its virtually identical butt-buddy communism, falls under the banner of Marxism. The previous century was the century of Marxism, and it was the bloodiest in all of human history, and it’s not even close. Where Marxism is implemented at scale, death also follows at scale.

The death counts were so high that the margins of error were in the tens of millions.

When asked whether you’d condemn socialism, the only correct answer is “yes”, and it should come emphatically and without hesitation. Yet, the Democrats were split on it, with more saying “nay” than “yay”.

Having a constituency to pander to is no excuse, considering that anyone holding office is expected to be among our intellectual betters, even if the constituency is not.

And, let’s be honest here, Marxists are generally not intelligent. If they appear to win a debate, it’s usually because they were up against someone who knows that Marxism is wrong, but didn’t properly prepare for the debate, likely because they thought that they’d find an easy grand-slam victory.

And the thing is, as stupid as Marxists may be, they’ve studied it extensively enough to present it to those who did not, and they were able to intuit the rules of rhetoric to be able to weild them deceptively against the unprepared.

And stupid people are Marxist for a reason: because capitalism is competitive, and that’s a game which they’d rather not play, because they don’t want to lose. They’d rather that everyone be at the same low level than for some people to be at high levels and some at low levels. Crabs in a bucket.

Let’s not kid ourselves here: some people just can’t succeed in a competitive environment. There’s this idea that everyone can be anything they want to be. It’s a fairy tale that helps people sleep at night. Sadly, some people are just going to work in fast food for years and years, and maybe struggle with it (and when you consider how the Dunning-Kruger effect works, they’ll probably still think they’re too smart for it).

Then along comes Marxism to sell them the pipe dream of equality of outcome. And because gullible people exist in immense numbers, tremendous amounts of bloodshed follow. And all the while, these same gullible people will believe that it’s because people aren’t cooperating.

Marxists are the flat-earthers of economic theory: they win by preying on the unprepared.

And they are a huge chunk of the Democrats constituency. And Democrats themselves don’t have the nerve to tell them that they’re wrong, and know that if they did, they’d split their own vote, and narrowly become a third party to a socialist party, if the above-mentioned House vote is any indication.

How close are we to seeing a repeat of the immense bloodshed of Marxism? I don’t know. It could happen as soon as the left takes control of the major branches of government, and might depend on whether they decide to kowtow to a huge portion of their constituency. And that could be just a few years from now.

It happened again.

Leave a reply

If anyone tries telling you that you don’t need a gun, there’s something that you can show them to let them know that they’re wrong.

They’re the same people who try telling you that, in the event that you’re robbed, you should just surrender, so that everyone involved (including the criminal) gets to live to see another day.

Show them this. And if they turn their nose up at a link to Fox News, then you can know that, in their case, it’s just a matter of time.

You don’t surrender because they might literally set you on fire.

This is 50-year-old Lawrence Reed, who probably quit his day job as a facial contortionist so he could lean into his extensive criminal career, which involves 49 previous arrests, and 8 felony convictions, only two of which he served prison time for.

Apparently, he had the idea that his 50th arrest had to be something special, so he chased down a 26-year-old woman at a subway station and lit her on fire.

Behind every career criminal that remained free after over a half-dozen felony convictions, there’s an absolutely worthless judge who gave him every chance to prove that society would’ve been better off without him.

In case you missed it, here’s Judge Molina-Gonzalez literally bragging about being a diversity hire:

One might get the idea that left-wing judges keep releasing dangerous offenders because they hate their victims, but that’s not true. These judges love victims so much, that they keep making more of them.

In all seriousness though, if you’re a judge and someone comes before you with their Nth felony, you have to ask whether they brought their toothbrush. And if you’re not comfortable with that, then what are you doing being a judge?

If this whole sordid affair sounds familiar, then your memory doesn’t suck. It was only about 3 months prior that Decarlos Brown, who had benefited from the revolving door of left-wing justice 14 times prior, thought that 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was reading his mind through happy magical technology that was somehow implanted into him, so he killed her shortly after she sat down in front of him. And this particular incident took place on a moving train.

Mercy is not always a virtue. Sometimes, it can be misplaced. If this is something that you cannot accept, then perhaps you can’t be a judge, because your idea of justice would be dangerous to society.

It’s outrageous crimes like this that get people creative when it comes to punishments. But I’m more interested in seeing reforms that would benefit society in the long-run.

For one thing, we need to create a disincentive for judges to repeatedly release dangerous offenders. If they took a hit to their pay any time someone they release goes on to become a dangerous offender, that may suffice. Because even if they don’t understand justice, they do comprehend their own personal incentives. And to that end, if judges want to fail at their jobs, then they can get hit right in the pocketbook. And after a certain number of failures, they’d just lose their positions as judges.

Another thing we can do is make prisons into places where people don’t want to be. Believe it or not, some people like it there, and become so accustomed to it that they don’t know how to live on the outside. And that’s a problem, because such people sometimes just commit more offenses, knowing that in prison, they have some amount of comfort that they can look forward to, and all their basic needs would be met without having to work for them.

Consider Japanese prisons: You’d have to be insane to want to be sent to one of those. Not only are Japanese prisons strictly regimented, the prisoners themselves are not even allowed to speak. Have fun trying to start a prison gang in conditions like that.

If American prisons were like Japanese prisons, people would actually want to stay out of them. Which is actually the point. It’s a punishment, after all; the point is that the prisoner isn’t getting what he wants.

So, this happened again, just three months later. Any guesses as to whether this will happen again in just a few months time? And any guesses as to how much longer this is going to continue, or whether people decide that they’re not going to take it anymore?

CITAP: Muhammad Part 7

1 Reply

Muhammad died slowly, painfully, and miserably.

Also, ironically.

When you think of groups of people who Muhammad disserviced the most, two groups come to mind: women, and the Jewish people. They’d both get their revenge.

Muhammad had committed genocide against multiple Jewish tribes and settlements. Many men were killed, children enslaved, and women became sex slaves.

One female Jewish survivor was tasked with preparing a meal for Muhammad.

I’m going to admit that being a megalomaniac is outside my area of expertise. But I think it’s pretty obvious that you’re not supposed to trust your professed enemies to prepare food for you, especially after you give them plenty of reason to hate your guts.

Because bad things could happen to your guts. Bad things.

Also, I think that that thought goes together well with the common sense advice that you don’t upset the person who cooks for you.

So, a Jewish woman who saw her community ravaged, her husband probably killed, and her children probably taken away from her, has a poison on hand, and an opportunity to prepare a meal for the person who destroyed her entire life. And she knows just what cut of lamb that he likes best.

And it’s an opportunity that she took.

Muhammad and his friends began feasting. One of them didn’t begin until he saw Muhammad begin, because he trusted him. As with so many others, his trust was misplaced.

When Muhammad tasted something funny, he demanded that everyone stop eating, saying that the food told him that it was poisoned.

This would have been more impressive if the food would have told him that before he started eating it.

Muhammad had the chef called in, and asked her to explain herself. Her explanation was that, if he were a prophet, the poison would have killed him, but if he were a king, then her people would have been rid of him.

Ready for a surprise? Muhammad forgave her. Yes, really. Except, not really. When one of Muhammad’s men, who also ate from the same meal, had died, Muhammad rescinded his forgiveness, and had the woman put to death.

But ultimately, the poison would kill Muhammad. But it took years for it to happen. And as the poison worked away at Muhammad’s system, he was in worsening pain by reason of the complications.

Some might point out that it probably wasn’t the poison that killed him. Some attribute his death to a fever. But Muhammad himself attributed his worsening condition to the poison.

It’s the inclination of Muslims to believe their prophet. But if they do that, they admit that their prophet was killed by a Jewish woman. Or they can decide not to, but why stop there when they can disbelieve many of his other ridiculous claims?

In the ancient world, it was considered humiliating for a man to be killed by a woman. Because of this, it might be difficult for Muslims to accept the way that their own prophet died. But would they disbelieve the claim made by their own prophet?

Because of this, Muhammad’s death puts Muslims in a difficult spot. They could accept the humiliating way Muhammad died because he said that that’s how he died, accepting this humiliation as an indelible feature of their religion, or they could disbelieve him, and risk losing their status as Muslims.

Over the course of years, Muhammad’s condition got worse. He was in such pain that he required the help of two men to carry him about.

Speaking of his pain, Muhammad complained that it felt like his aorta had been severed. This is interesting, because Muhammad had previously said that if he was lying, then his aorta would be severed. While it’s possible that he meant this as a colloquialism for a great amount of pain, there’s still a lot of potential in that phrase to be interpreted in a way that’s disfavorable to Muhammad.

But is that really needed considering that he was a false prophet, traitor, oath breaker, rapist, child molester, torturer, and on, and on…

Muhammad turned to folk remedies, such as cumin, to no avail.

In his desperation, Muhammad turned to blowing on knots. This was a form of sorcery where a knot was formed which represented one’s illness, and the act of undoing it by blowing it undone has been said by practitioners to cure the illness. As you might expect, it didn’t work.

Practicing sorcery is a huge no-no. It’s been forbidden by Abrahamic religions. Even Islam forbids it. But Muhammad practiced sorcery by blowing on knots. He was supposed to be Islam’s greatest prophet (an easy hurtle to clear, considering that he was Islam’s only prophet). Was he disqualified by his own religion? More than he already was?

But then, Muhammad claimed to have another visit from the angel, Gabriel. According to Muhammad, Gabriel told him that he wouldn’t die. We know how reliable Muhammad’s visions are, don’t we?

Muhammad would die days later. At his request, he would die in the company of his favorite wife, Aisha.

Muhammad didn’t anticipate his death, so he didn’t appoint a successor. He likely realized that if he did, the successor would have a motivation to assassinate him. And Muhammad probably didn’t care what would become of his empire after his own death.

In the days to come, those close to Muhammad would jockey for control of the caliphate, a battle that would continue in the centuries to come in the form of the Sunni/Shia divide. It’s a divide that’s so bitter that some Muslims consider one another infidels. Part of the reason why Islam hasn’t spread further than it could have is because Muslims have been divided against themselves.

One might imagine that Muhammad would go to heaven in his own religion. But in reality, Muhammad was unsure of his own salvation. And he didn’t die in battle, meaning that he wouldn’t have gotten the special 72 virgins treatment.

This is the reason why Muslims frequently append Muhammad’s name with the phrase “peace be upon him”. Even though he was supposed to be his religion’s greatest (actually, only) prophet, his religion might have still condemned him to hell.

In Christianity, there’s more than one kind of salvation, and they are provided for mankind. One is a spiritual salvation, preserving us from the eternal punishment for our sins, and another is a physical salvation, where the Messiah intervenes in a future time to prevent humanity from destroying itself. Both forms of salvation are undeserved. And considering the kinds of ideologies, including religions, that humans have invented, we definitely need a savior.

The legacy of Muhammad has been a legacy of terror, violence, and bloodshed, overlaid with suffocating legalism and mind-numbing ritual. If you’ve learned a few things about Muhammad, you’ve learned that he’s not worth believing in, and that the religion that he invented is the way it is because of him.

Muhammad was truly one of history’s worst people.

Back to Part 6