Category Archives: Culture War

They literally want a concentration camp.

Leave a reply

Now’s a great time to see how the left is doing:

That far along, huh? I thought we had more time.

From San Antonio Current:

“She’ll turn Karnes ICE Detention Center into a prison for American Zionists and former ICE officers for human trafficking,” Galindo wrote in an Instagram post over the weekend, referring to herself in the third person. “It will also be a castration processing center for pedophiles, which will probably be most of the Zionists.”

When someone says that that’s her intended policy, go ahead and believe her, because most people who fantasize about such things would usually keep it to themselves.

It’s already a massive red flag that a politician declares her policy positions via Instagram. And the fact that she refers to herself in the third person is characteristic of a random lunatic who raves at random pedestrians in a city square.

But all that is eclipsed by the fact that she wants to repurpose a government building into a concentration camp for imprisoning enforcers of immigration law, and those who believe Jews should have their own little country, while falsely accusing them of pedophilia as a pretext for having them neutered.

That sounds like the kind of thing that a shrill, college-aged leftist would pretend that Trump said, because they want to make him look as bad as possible, and has no motherfucking idea how to pull their punches to make a lie sound remotely believable.

But Maureen Galindo, a Democrat running for Congress, said it as her own policy position.

Over the past week, Galindo has accused her runoff opponent — former Bexar County Public Information Officer Johnny Garcia — of participating in a human trafficking conspiracy orchestrated by billionaire zionist Jews.

She crazy. That’s end-stage TikTok brain rot. That’s the kind of shit where, once you believe it, the belief itself configures prions into your brain, and it’s just a matter of time until you lose all motor function, and die due to inability to sleep.

Even so, in comments to the Current and other media outlets, Galindo maintained she only has an issue with zionists, or those advocating for the existence of a Jewish state in their ancestral homeland, rather than Jews in general.

There it is. The classic leftist equivocation. This time, she’s trying to avoid being branded as “antisemitic”, because that’s a word which sounds bad, and is only for use against bad people. So she explains that she opposes something that Jews generally happen to desire. Then, when she does go after the Jews she hates, she can make the claim of not actually hating them.

If anyone falls for that, the world must be a confusing place for them.

Indeed, mainstream Democrats have drifted away from Galindo as she ramped up her rhetoric.

Please do. Because damn.

To give you an idea of just how far Maureen Galindo has gone, consider the fact that AOC thinks she has taken it too far:

Think about what it means when, next to Maureen Galindo, AOC sounds like the voice of reason.

If you don’t picture Maureen Galindo’s thinking taking root in American politics, consider the following:

Twenty-seven percent. That’s the percentage of Democrats who, when presented with an opportunity to vote for Maureen Galindo, decided to do so.

I’ve pointed out before that as leftists continue to lose the culture war, some of them will feel threatened, particularly the dead-enders who invested too much into their political ideology, and that they may interpret the changing flow of the era as a threat to respond to with violence.

The fact that the left is becoming increasingly extreme in their violence and their rhetoric goes to show that they’re not handling losing well.

Now, there’s a leftist running for office who is openly calling for a concentration camp with compulsory sterilization. And while it’s true that she’s being condemned, even within her own party, what’s concerning is that her rhetoric is not instantly disqualifying, and that she could come away with as much as 27% of her party’s vote where she was on the ballot, which is way too much.

Buy home security.

Game Journalists Aren’t the Real Problem, Anymore.

Leave a reply

There’s another gaming controversy involving game journalists, which is being treated as yet another attempt to relive GamerGate.

And while the GamerGate days may be fond memories for some people, if we’re being completely honest here, game journalists just aren’t taken seriously by anyone, anymore. They burned any trust that they had in the original GamerGate by siding against gamers themselves. And prior to that, they’ve long had the problem of pandering to advertisers.

In this connected age, when it comes to game opinions, people trust their peers more than game journos. I’d rather hear the opinions of my peers, whom I can relate to, rather than those of professional journalists who are acting on obvious incentives, and therefore cannot be trusted to be genuine.

But if I can thank game journalists for just one thing, it’s for demonstrating to many millions of gamers exactly why they cannot trust the press. They’ve played an unwitting role in the “gamer to right-wing pipeline”. And they’ve done it well.

Before moving on to what I see as the real problem, I’ll first acknowledge the current controversy. A droll nostalgia game has gotten a suspiciously high number of perfect review scores from various publications, in spite of the fact that gamers themselves aren’t impressed with it.

The game is called Mixtape, and it stars teenagers in a pseudo-90s cultural environment. I’ve heard that it largely attempts to pander to a sense of nostalgia, but instead alienates players who actually were teenagers during that same era. The gameplay, from what I’ve heard, makes the game sound like a movie with interactive segments, those being minigames with a lack of fail-states.

I didn’t play it, and I’m not interested.

The game sounds insipid, and demeaning to true 90s kids. But for some reason, one gaming publication after another has given the pile a perfect score. Scores which, by the way, are usually reserved for games considered revolutionary, or masterpieces.

But, I didn’t care. And I wouldn’t have even noticed what game journalists were up to, if my own peers didn’t point it out.

At this point, it’s taken for granted that game journalists are trash. It is what it is.

As I see it, the real problem that game communities face is clout farmers.

If you’re wondering what a clout farmer is, that would be someone who trashes on something on social media, with the intention of drawing attention to themselves. Such a person tends to manifest in gaming communities as someone who continually dumps on a game, usually a new or popular installment of a franchise, in an attempt to seem smart or discerning with how negative they could be about the game in question.

The low-IQ among us tends to leave likes on the edgy thing that shits on something people like. But if you were to visit the clout farmer’s profile, you’d find one post after another, shitting on fun games that people like. It’s quite possible that they don’t like anything. Or maybe they do. I certainly don’t want to scroll through an entire account’s raw sewage just to see whether they can say anything positive about anything.

If you call them out on it, they’ll just accuse you of being on some kind of “toxic positivity” brigade, because they don’t like when people like things.

This has gotten to be an issue within the Pokémon community, to the point that those who actually play the game have said that they enjoy the games more when they don’t interact with the community. If the clout farmers were actually trolls out to destroy the community, this would mean that they’re succeeding.

But we have a weapon, and it’s been in our hands, the whole time: you block the bullshitters.

If an obvious clout farmer appears on your feed, here’s what you do (on X):

  • Click the vertical ellipses in the upper-right corner of their post,
  • Then, click the option to mute their account. You may be asked to confirm.

That’s it. Repeat as more obvious clout farmers appear. Then, enjoy your improved fandom!

While it’s true that game journos are still adversarial towards the very people they claim to write for, people today generally know to ignore them. Case in point: They’re insistent that GamerGate was a misogynistic harassment campaign, but there’s a strong likelihood that you know that that’s not the case.

The reason why clout farmers are the bigger issue is that they’re a problem particular to social media, which is still relatively new. And because gamers still haven’t universally learned to recognize and deal with them, clout farmers still succeed in infiltrating and dragging down gaming communities.

But now that you know how to eliminate them from your feed, you can do your part to reduce their influence. After all, it’s attention they seek, and you can deny them yours.

A Mosque was attacked, this time.

Leave a reply

It can be called a switch, if you want. But it was really just a matter of time.

A mosque in San Diego was attacked by two gunmen. Five are confirmed dead, including one of the Mosque’s security personnel, and both gunmen. The gunmen were in their teens, they apparently ended their own lives, and it would seem the attack was racially motivated, judging by materials left by the gunmen.

I’m ready for this to be all that we hear about from the Islamic world for the next couple decades. They can’t take it anywhere close to how they dish it out.

The Islamic world is famous for its sectarian violence, whether it Muslims versus other religions, or it’s Muslims against other Muslims which they consider infidels over a microscopic difference in doctrine.

It’s gotten to the point that Muslims are the most distrusted group in the civilized world. And that’s a dubious honor that’s well earned, what with Muslims going on shooting rampages, driving cars into Christmas markets, executing African Christians, suicide bombing bus stations, committing random knife attacks, hijacking planes for use as projectiles, raping women and children when presented with the opportunity…

…and on, and on, and on…

…All while acting as though they’re better than everyone else, and entitled to everything, including the land in which they are guests.

If anyone or any group is going to be a constant belligerent, it’s to be expected that they’ll come to find pushback.

Muslims need to realize that their religion isn’t worth surrendering their souls to. Islam drains the joy out of life, and for all that trouble, it can’t truly offer salvation, anyway.

Christianity is far superior. Not only does it offer a more joyful life, Christians actually get saved. All of them.

And if Muslims are finally going to start facing what they’ve been continually dishing out, then that’s all the more reason to leave Muhammad’s religion in the dustbin.

Besides, Muhammad predicted that a day of doom would occur within 500 years of his death. It’s been over 1400 years. What are Muslims clinging to?

Another ironic story out of the UK

Leave a reply

The UK pretty much sucks when it comes to free speech. They just fail, over and over again.

Tapping the sign:

This time, a V-Tuber in the UK was arrested for possession of her own drawings.

Your imagination likely went to one of two places: cartoons of Muhammad, or drawings of naked people. It’s the latter.

UK based V-Tuber Mimi Yanagi issued a public statement on X, letting her following know that she was out on bail after having been arrested for possession of her own drawings. Her electronic devices were seized, including the ones she used as a professional V-Tuber. What’s more, as per her bail conditions, she was to use an approved handle, may only post SFW content, and must be transparent with her content.

Because it’s British police we’re talking about here, I don’t feel inclined to give the benefit of the doubt. They probably saw an opportunity to score some sweet loot, and Mimi is probably not going to see it again.

“A Go Pro? Little Harry always wanted to be a streamer! A £3500 gaming rig? Guess who’s not spending on Christmas presents this year? LED illuminated mouse and keyboard? Yoink! Why’d she have two monitors? Now she’s got naught!”

Allegedly, the drawings contained characters which Mimi herself imagined, had the appearance of being childlike, and were of the rule 34 variety. In the UK, such images are illegal to produce, distribute, or even possess, even if the characters depicted are clearly fictitious.

This is one of those matters where, if you have a free speech perspective, you choose your words with care if you’re trying to avoid looking like some kind of creep. But considering that the whole matter was victimless, to arrest anyone over it is silly. Even if the art in question inspires an ick vibe for most people, it’s still just drawings.

But there’s an irony to this that can be pointed out. And you probably know what it is.

The UK has a problem with migrant Islamic rape gangs. And British police have infamously been looking the other way, for fear of being called racist.

In the graphic below, two are pictured. One traumatized a real-life British 12-year-old. The other drew pictures for herself and perhaps for other adults who were minding their own business in their own homes.

Can you guess which one got off without consequences, and which one got the legal equivalent of a spear tackle followed by a jackhammer slam?

If the UK wants anyone to take them seriously, they’d leave the poor woman be, and give her back all her devices. She harmed no one.

Then, they’d go after all the Islamic migrants who actually are victimizing little girls. Based on their behavior, one might think British police care more about the non-existent plight of fictional girls, than that of real girls from among their own people.

Stabbed teen cuffed by British police over racism allegation dies in custody

Leave a reply

Normally, when I comment on this sort of thing, I start off with the facts of the case, then go on a little rant. This time, I’m going to flip matters on its head, and start with a rant, then I’ll get into the story.

I’m getting sick of seeing people on my side of the culture war black-pilling just because their enemies have a plan, and the first steps have already been taken.

This is even the case when it comes to Islamic migrants, whose plan largely comes down to, “We’re going to walk right in, rape out of control, your government is going to give us housing and your money, then we’re going to implement Sharia law so your freedoms go bye bye and this becomes yet another graceless Islamic theocracy.”

Then the blackpillers collectively throw their hands up, as though the only expectation is that everyone who might otherwise resist will just get one one side and just take it up the wazoo.

The fact is, the idea of one’s own country turning into a place where their own daughters cannot safely walk down the street is not something that most people would be willing to tolerate. And when they find out that that’s what’s going on, they’re going to fight back, and they’re not going to give a shit whether anyone calls them racist.

There will be a time that the UK can look back on as the turning point, the point in time in which Brits can agree is when they’ve decided that they’re done being abused by migrants, the corrupt ruling class, and the TikTok-brained and their threats of calling them racist.

This story would be that turning point.

The irony is, the offender in this story wouldn’t be a Muslim. It would be a Sikh. But he still suffices as a figure for cultural incompatibility.

A 23-year-old Sikh man has been charged for the murder of an 18-year-old British student, using a Sikh ceremonial dagger.

While the murder is already sickening, the very fact that the murder was carried out using a religious implement could be more ironic. But, it gets worse.

While the murder was being carried out, the murderer, Vickrum Digwa, shouted “racism”.

Between the stabbing and the allegation of racism, can you guess which one British police responded to?

Too easy. The police cuffed the boy who was stabbed, even as he was bleeding out as a result of the attack. The killer’s mother took the weapon home with her. The 18-year-old died in police custody.

Yeah. That actually happened.

British police are already famously unreliable when it comes to any complaint of violence on the part of a minority. But they are aggressive in their pursuit of social media and speech wrongthink. It’s gotten to the point where the UK has received the dubious honor of being the global leader in arrests for online comments, greatly surpassing China and Russia.

The British have evidently become tired of the way things have been trending, as evidenced by the fact that the new right-wing Reform party has swept the recent British election, beating out all other parties, including the established Labor party, which lost seats. They also soundly defeated a new green party which pandered to constituents more sympathetic to Islam.

In fact, I’ve never seen a new party win as convincingly as the new Reform party. And they might perform even better, now that Brits are coming to realize that they’re not alone in their own country.

British police may be a farce, and some people may blackpill over that. But it’s not over until it’s over.

Democrat Running for Senate Arrested For Threatening President and a Member of Congress

Leave a reply
“Be kind”. LOL.

It’s only been days since the last attempt on the president’s life, bringing the count up to about 3 or 4, and we already have yet another spaz issuing threats to a Republican lawmaker, his family, and the president.

Here’s what we have from WPXI:

An Allegheny County man is accused of threatening to kill President Donald Trump and a member of Congress.

They identify him as Raymond Chandler. But they left out an important detail: he’s a Pennsylvania Democrat running for Senate!

Now, why would they leave out something like that? Why did WPXI deem that to be extraneous information, in this political climate?

Here’s Raymond Chandler, pictured below:

Oh, sorry. That’s not him. My bad. Here’s the real Raymond Chandler:

The guy looks like he’s only a viking helmet away from stealing the Ox King’s look. But while he marketed himself as a wholesome guy wearing a bow tie and suspenders, there’s a dark side behind this carefully manufactured persona.

Courtesy of The Gateway Pundit, here is a message that he sent to a member of Congress:

“Sir, I have, uh, I’m calling this morning ’cause I want you to imagine a scenario. I want you to imagine a scenario where all the 1,200 billionaires in this country, all their properties, are surrounded simultaneously by a thousand people.”

“So imagine your house, your daughter’s house, everyone you know and love who is also rich. Imagine every single one of those homes being surrounded by a thousand people.”

“Then imagine them all getting a text and then, then suddenly taking out their pocket knives, walking slowly towards your house with 10, you got your 10 guards or whatever against a thousand people, and then they come and they pull you out of your house and they slit your throat and they slit your daughter’s throat and they slit everyone’s throat. That you know, sir, that is the future…”

This comes off as a sick fantasy that a middle schooler would have if they were dumb enough to take Hasan Piker seriously. It’s also characterized by the kind of equivocation that is a hallmark of leftist thought. Like the mafia member who says “it would be a shame if something happened to your store” in an effort to extort protection money, Raymond could attempt to say that it wasn’t him specifically who would be behind the hypothetical attack.

To understand equivocation goes a long way in understanding how leftists communicate.

Chandler’s motivation was that “wealth concentration has gotten so bad in this country,”. A country in which, by the way, nearly every resident has climate control, emergency healthcare, refrigeration, electricity, a connection to the summation of human knowledge, supplemental food assistance, access to vehicular transportation, unlimited free entertainment, and in nearly every respect lives a better lifestyle than a king would have centuries ago.

Some people are simply envious. No matter how well they have it, they will always want more.

Chandler left a voicemail for a congressman, stating a desire for the congressman to assassinate the president. While this is in a cruder form, it’s yet another expression of how leftists use telecommunications to attempt to influence other people into doing things.

So much for the wholesome image that Raymond was going for.

He also said that the president is “a liar among all liars. He’s a great deceiver. He’s the antichrist,”. He was going for it with the religious-flavored language. Which often means that someone needs to calm down.

Considering this, and the recent uptick in left-wing violence, there’s something that I’ve been thinking about. I suspect that if Trump ran against Hitler, leftists would have voted for Hitler.

That might sound preposterous. But suppose that Hitler had his name and appearance changed. The only thing that would remain the same would be Hitler’s policy positions. Under these conditions, it becomes more reasonable to expect leftists to vote for the Socialist leader.

Defective: The Cole Allen Manifesto

Leave a reply

There is a certain risk that we become increasingly desensitized by the continual bullshittery. But as things like this occur over and over again, it’s not a bad idea to remind ourselves that events like this are still newsworthy.

Just over this weekend, some leftist piece of work bum rushed the White House Correspondence’s Dinner, firing off, and only managing to hit one officer, who is expected to make a quick and full recovery by reason of the bulletproof vest that he was wearing.

Pictured above is Cole Allen, a California school teacher who viewed it as his duty to carry out the brazen attack. And thanks to New York Post, we have his manifesto to tell us just how senseless he really was.

You can follow the link to read the full manifesto. I just wanted to comment on a few things about it.

I could be more surprised than I am that something so dimwitted could be written by a California school teacher. But by the time I got through it, I had the idea that perhaps he got his education through continual hand-ups just for looking different and playing the victim at strategic points, and that doing so didn’t do society any favors.

For one thing, he opens with the confession that what he was about to do was going to upset and disappoint a lot of people who know him personally. That should have been taken by Cole himself to indicate that what he intended to do was a bad idea, and that he shouldn’t have gone through with it. Many such things would have indicated as much, but considering that manifestos from infamous criminals usually indicate that they tend to view themselves as heroes, Cole’s manifesto stands out for its confession of the foolishness of his planned crime, but rather than elect to not disappoint and upset everyone around him, Cole attempted murder.

Cole Allen’s next failure of intellect is his presumption of collective guilt, which is against the principles of justice in Christianity and the United States. Which goes to show that he did not allow the surrounding culture to impart its virtue upon him.

The fact is, no one bears the guilt for anyone else’s crime. Not only does Christianity recognize this, and informs how the United States handles justice, collective guilt is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a fact that one would expect one to comprehend if they were employed in academia.

But it gets worse. Because the very charge that he levies is bullshit:

“And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.”

Like anyone else who believes such things about Trump, Cole Allen is gullible and intellectually defective. But not everyone who peddles such untreated sewage actually believes it. As I often say, much of the internet is trying to get other people to do things.

When someone wants something done, but doesn’t want to get their own hands dirty, they try to get other people wound up, so that they do it, instead.

It’s easy to see where Cole Allen was in that relationship.

Cole continued on by outlining his priority of targets, at the top of which were administration officials, followed by anyone who would act to protect them. At this point, it should already be clear that Cole was motivated by political ideology. But I still expect the usual suspects to disingenuously pretend that they have no idea what could have possibly motivated the latest in a long string of violent leftists.

After this, Cole listed some anticipated objections to his planned crime, followed by his own rebuttals to these objections. These largely come down to building up strawmen, so he could then tear them down. A couple of the points he attempted to make indicated a certain disrespect towards Christianity, which isn’t a surprise, as indicated by his application of his belief in collective guilt.

A more intelligent person would have immediately understood the fallacies that Cole employed, and understood that such misguided reasoning was certainly not worth attempting murder over. That Cole Allen became a school teacher would seem an anomaly. But that there’s something wrong with California’s public education system doesn’t defy the imagination.

Based on everything I’ve read in the manifesto so far, it wouldn’t surprise me if Cole Allen had the early stages of kuru or some other neurodegenerative disease. His manifesto, and his attempted crime, don’t seem consistent with what one would expect from a school teacher.

Cole published his manifesto shortly before the attempted assassination. Just before doing so, Cole added a post script, in which he boasted about how far he had gotten with his plan, which he attributed to failures on the parts of security. Ultimately, the greatest failures were with him. But it can still be amusing to see how a known failure had taken a misguided comfort in his own illusory superiority.

More details about the failure that is Cole Allen are coming to light. As this happens, I would like to offer speculation as to what might have contributed to Cole Allen’s decision to attempt to assassinate administration officials.

I suspect that he was facing personal struggles. And some of them are likely to have been a consequence of taking on challenges that he was either unprepared or unsuited for.

Being a minority in California, Cole Allen was in an excellent environment for appealing with his minority status to acquire opportunities. What’s more, whenever he was at risk of failure, he could easily leverage victimhood status to acquire what he wants through pity. With numerous Californian educators not wanting to take the risk of being branded a racist, even if falsely, it’s easy to imagine that Cole could navigate the Californian education system with the social tools at his disposal.

However, if a school system graduates a student who’s not really prepared for employment, they’re not really doing that student a favor. However long one may kick the can down the road, there will come a time when a person must contribute real value, or else just give up.

Even if Cole had value to contribute, it remains that life is often not easy, even for those with substantial intelligence. The fact is, we all have struggles. That’s a fact of life.

For those with an external locus of control, as Cole Allen apparently did, it’s easy to blame other people for their problems. Student loan debt? It’s probably because the system took advantage of you in some way. Rent too high? It’s probably because the landlord is being greedy. In bad health? It’s the food industry’s fault for making unhealthy food so accessible. Those with an external locus of control tend to struggle more with their problems because they tend to ignore where they have some amount of control.

And they tend to view themselves as victims. And following this reasoning to extremes, they may lash out at the people that they view as victimizing them, even if they seek some other justification. For example, trying to become a hero for other people.

Cole Allen was probably facing a failure that he had no apparent options for avoiding. His teaching award was evidently a sham. He probably couldn’t measure up to other teachers in a true meritocratic environment. He certainly wasn’t a success as a game designer.

Derp.

But rather than fail in the way that was foreseeable, he decided to fail in his own way: by going down in flames. But while he certainly did, it didn’t happen the way he might have wanted.

“Stay in school, kids.”

It’s apparent just how well school served him.

The Courtroom Crashout

Leave a reply

We have another special one. And this time, a lawyer who is a literal woman with a beard went on a full-on crashout in a courtroom.

Caught on camera:

Commenters were quick to say that a woman taking testosterone led to the crash out. That’s plausible, as many people who turn trans end up taking hormones that have an effect on their behavior.

As an aside, if it turns out that there is some kinda parasite that causes people to turn trans, I thought of a name for it: parasite Steve.

If you get the reference, great.

Some highlights:

Let’s hear it for the man who baited the lawyer, causing her to sperg out, thus ending her career. Yup. The woman shortly after closed her law office:

Wow, that’s her banner? I’d be embarrassed to hire her.

Like many people who get their worldview from TV, she seemed to assume that being male means acting like a hot-headed fuckbelch. She seemed to miss that real men control their passions, rather than be controlled by them.

Imagine being the guy who legally pushes a lawyer to the point that she destroys her own career. You don’t have to deserve what you drink, but it does make it taste better. And in his case, whatever he drank to celebrate had to have tasted great.

And that look on his face tells me that he knew exactly what he’s done.

Absolute legend.

Another highlight would be where the woman brought the fact that she’s trans into it, entirely unprompted, for no reason other than that she perceived some advantage to be had in doing so.

And what’s more, she demanded female officers when she was being arrested. Perhaps because she had less expectation that they could successfully subdue her. Or it could be that she was doing whatever she could to make things difficult, equivocating between her declared and her actual gender depending on the perceived advantage. As much as I might like to imagine that the woman had a stressed-induced reboot to a previous software version.

One point that I’d like to make is that, to contradict what some people are saying, it is true that a person can still speak, even to the point of calling out for help, when their respiration is not sufficient to sustain life. The whole “if you can talk you can breathe” deal is a myth which needs to be put to rest. Hopkins sounded like a dumbass, don’t you go sounding like one, too.

But whatever you said today, it probably wasn’t nearly as stupid as Hopkins’ career-ending crashout.

The fact is, we live in a world with selection pressures. When there’s a lot at stake, no one is obligated to humor someone else’s delusion. Reality doesn’t concern itself with who it pulverizes underfoot in its inexorable march, not does it even slightly slow down.

Reality marches on.

He didn’t take the news well.

Leave a reply

The trans community is breathing a collective sigh of relief, because the latest murder ‘tard wasn’t one of their own. This time, it was another member of Homer Simpson’s “thinking man’s religion”.

If you feel like you’ve seen him before, it’s because he’s got a familiar look on his face. Remember the kid from elementary school who was much taller than all the other kids, because he was held back a couple years? The one who, whenever there was a test, the teacher would sit down with just so he’d answer the questions?

Yeah, he’s got the same look. The lights are on, but nobody’s home.

As you can see, he wears a sweatshirt which says, “Property of Allah”. By the time his character arc was complete, he certainly was owned.

The guy, named Ndiaga Diagne, was a 53-year-old Senegaleze immigrant, who went on a shooting spree in Austin, TX in the early morning of March 1, 2026.

Yep. Another crime that was completely preventable, because we should not have brought in someone from a PVP server of a country. Someone from a completely different culture did something consistent with that culture. Imagine my shock.

The guy wore a shirt with an IRGC flag on it underneath his lame sweatshirt, and had a copy of the Quran in his car. As for his motive, it was a mystery. Who could tell what motivated him?

During the incident, Ndiagne killed three people, and at least 14 were wounded, before police prevented any redemption arc that he could have embarked on.

Just the fact that someone would respond to the strike on the Ayatollah in such a way goes to show that the strike was the right choice. We just can’t have that kind of ideology in a civil society.

Some might say that the strike was a bad idea, because of the threat of such people responding. If someone threatens you, and you respond by giving them what they want, that’s the same as rewarding them for threatening you. Of course they’re going to do it again.

Sometimes, you have to get into a fight you’d prefer to avoid. It’s a fact that we don’t live in an ideal world, as some might imagine an ideal world to be. When we understand this, it’s to be expected that actions based on utopian idealism be disregarded in favor of what’s more expedient, given the reality of the circumstances.

There are some people you just can’t reason with. This would include people who belong to a death cult. Their own vision of an ideal world clashes with reality. And when that becomes apparent to them, they tend to respond violently. And as their ideology was threatened, some of their fanatics will feel as though they are backed into a corner, and they will become dangerous.

Let’s not kid ourselves, here. Where there are people who cannot be reasoned with, conflict is inevitable. And as the conflict is delayed, fanatics become more emotionally invested, and grow in number, ensuring that the bloodshed will be even worse.

Thus, it’s important that we recognize the wickedness of Islamic ideology, and remove it from among us, while it’s relatively easy to do so

Fake Christians are easy to spot, actually.

Leave a reply

I’ve pointed out before that one of the reasons why Americans are so susceptible to propaganda is because they haven’t been taught to recognize it. It’s a sad side effect of having an establishment that insists on propagandizing them. For the people who propagandize them to teach them to recognize propaganda would be a self-defeating endeavor.

So, there are people running amuck on social media, beguiling the less based Americans by influencing them, easily using translators to create the appearance that they reside in the same country as they do.

And in some cases, they’ll wear the pretense of Christianity as a skinsuit, knowing that there is a high potential to deceive people by taking on the appearance of their religion.

But these people tend to give themselves away in some subtle ways. And once you know what they are, it’ll become far more easy to notice them.

The first giveaway is huge to the point that I’ve decided to place it first, so it will be less likely that you’ll miss it. And it’s important that people know about it, because we see a whole lot of this on social media.

It’s an eagerness to try to use Biblical sounding teachings in an effort to try to get you to do what they want. This is huge, and a massive giveaway, because it says a lot about where the faker’s mind actually is, spiritually speaking.

In their thinking, religion is about manipulating people. And the value of a religion to them is in how they can use it to get other people to do what they want. It’s particularly ironic if they call any other religion a cult, because a cult leader thinks exactly the same way that they do.

One topical example is when they present the verse in which the Israelites are told not to vex foreigners. This is usually presented with an implication, which does a lot of work, that Christian societies are supposed to accept unchecked mass migration and open borders. Conveniently, it absolutely ignores every verse which expresses that anyone who travels to the land of Israel is expected to assimilate, to the point that they are expected to observe the weekly Sabbath, and the penalty of death for certain sins also applies to them.

Why leave out such important information? For one thing, they might not actually be aware of what the Bible says. Another possibility is that they know what the Bible’s teachings are outside of the verse that they present, but don’t want you to come to any conclusion besides the one that they want you to come to.

In either case, they’re not someone whom you would want to turn to for advice on how to run a Christian society, or make serious decisions on how to run your life or your household. And that they don’t know their Bible very well might just be the giveaway that they might not actually be a Christian.

And there are a lot more forms of this. A lot more. A lot of it comes down to, “be nice, because your religion says so” or “give me stuff, because of how you probably misunderstand a verse”. It’s easy to see through the agenda, and you’ll be less likely to fall for it if you have an understanding of your Bible.

The next giveaway is in how they use the imagery that’s often associated with the Crusades. If you’re a Christian, then you probably view the Crusades in the same way that I do: It was unfortunate business, but ended up being necessary in order to prevent the world from being plunged into spiritual darkness. And some Christians present the imagery that’s associated with the Crusades to try to get a rise out of Muslims, because they know that the Islamic world is still pretty bitter about them.

But, suppose a Muslim wanted to attempt to take on the appearance of Christianity. Oftentimes, they would attempt this by taking on the imagery of the Crusades.

Initially, one might think that they would be repulsed by the thought, as this would seem offensive to Islamic sensibilities. And it would be. After all, the Crusades were a conflict in which Christianity, after enduring centuries of Islamic oppression where two-thirds of the Christian world was conquered, started fighting back, and took back Christian lands in mere decades.

And yet, Muslims who want to take on the appearance of Christianity would take on the imagery of the Crusades. But why?

It’s because the Crusades were the one aspect of Christian history that Muslims can better identify with. Islam is, at it’s core, a supremacist ideology that is obsessed with military expansion. While Muslims may hate the Crusades because they were one way that the Christian world fought back against the Islamic world, they don’t disagree with it’s methods, and it’s something that they wish that they could have instead done to Christianity, if given the chance.

In Islamic thinking, the value of a religion is in its ability to take over the world through conquest. So, while Muslims hate what the Crusades did to them, they still appeal to their sensibilities. If they were to attempt to mimic Christianity, it’s natural that they’d gravitate towards what most appeals to them.

Another giveaway is Jew hatred. And this is a strong one, because hatred towards the Jews by Christians is rare, and has no Biblical justification for it. And considering that it’s the background of Jesus himself, it would be completely irrational.

However, for Muslims, it’s coded into their religion, to the point that the typical sincere Muslim is obsessed with it.

In fact, if it’s a simple litmus test to see whether someone is a fake Christian that you want, try to pivot the conversation to Jews in any way, and see how long it takes for them to start sperging out.

Again, there’s no Biblical justification for hatred towards the Jews. However, for fake Christians, deviant theology tends to favor hatred for the Jews, and much of it is pretty irrational and in stark disregard for clear Biblical teachings that don’t leave any room for misinterpretation.

Oftentimes, they’ll point to the Jews that called for the execution of Jesus, and Pilate’s response to them. Those Jews insisted upon it, to the point that they’d be willing to accept the guilt for their children, and their successive generations after them. And Pilate “washed his hands” to proclaim his innocence of what he was about to do.

The problem is, this ignores the clear Biblical teaching that each person is accountable for their own sin. Pilate was guilty of what he did, regardless of his own insistence of innocence. And the crowd of Jews didn’t have any ability to cast guilt onto their descendants for what they themselves were guilty of.

The fact is, a person doesn’t have any ability to cast guilt for their own actions onto another human being, as if to gather all their guilt into some kamehameha wave so someone else is guilty instead. The idea that a person could is counter to Biblical teachings about how sin and guilt is handled, which Christians have applied to how they handle justice for millennia.

In fact, it’s a basic Christian teaching. So basic, that if someone claims to be Christian and doesn’t get it, they either don’t understand the Bible very well, or they aren’t actually a Christian, at all.

But that’s not all that they either overlook or just ignore. They also tend to downplay that Jesus himself was Jewish. In fact, he could probably be called the most Jewish man who ever lived. The first of the four gospels makes the point that he was a physical descendant of King David. And out of all Jewish people who ever lived, he was easily the most famous, and it’s not even close. And when you know that Moses was not Jewish (he was a Levite), you know that Jesus has no competition in that regard.

What’s more, Jesus’ followers were almost exclusively Jewish. He had as many as thousands of them following him around at one point. And of his many Jewish followers, he chose 12 of them to be his disciples. And later, Paul would be Jewish, too.

If it weren’t for Jews, you wouldn’t have Christianity. And Christians know that. So when someone says that they’re Christian and hates Jews with a passion, they’re showing their hand. Oftentimes, it just comes down to someone trying to use your religion to manipulate you into doing what they want. And you’ll be less likely to fall for it if you have a strong Scriptural understanding.

While there are other ways that fake Christians make themselves evident, those are the big ones. What one can look out for is whether they appear in a manner that’s suspiciously image focused, or they get some basic things seriously wrong, particularly in ways that they wouldn’t if their understanding of the Bible were consistent with someone who has actually studied it with the intention of properly understanding matters that it teaches.

I might come back and add more some other time.