Feminists have the opportunity to congratulate Japan’s first ever Female Prime Minister!

Leave a reply
Sanae Takaichi

Japan has just officially confirmed a freshly elected Prime Minister. And what’s more, she’s the first ever women to hold the position in Japan’s history!

Now, if you’re wondering why feminists aren’t celebrating, it’s because they don’t actually want women to succeed, they’re just political grifters.

Senae Takaichi is a member of Japan’s Liberal Democratic party. Upon hearing the party name, one in the west might assume that she’s on the left. Not really, because Japan’s Liberal Democratic party is basically similar to the west’s conservatives. She is a predecessor of fellow party member and former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who was assassinated in 2022.

Yet another conservative that was assassinated. This really needs to stop happening.

Senae is largely considered to be Japan’s Donald Trump. She has opposed mass migration into Japan, which was intended to bring in cheap labor to help offset the effects of Japan’s aging population. She is considered to be bombastic by Japanese standards, and was previously an avid motorcyclist and heavy metal drummer. Yes, seriously.

It’s pretty clear that Takaichi’s election is the latest expression in a growing global trend that resists mass migration, particularly from cultures that don’t have much respect for the host culture, with some migrants expressing a clear desire to supplant the host culture.

It was only within the last couple days that Ireland had exploded into riots (“the language of the unheard”, right leftists?) because it was discovered that an Islamic migrant, who should have earlier been deported, had raped a 10-year-old special needs girl who wandered too close to the migrant hotel that he was staying at.

Leftists have long called the right sexist, which generally isn’t true, though there are those on the right who can rightly be described as such. But from what we see with the election of Takaichi, conservatives as a whole don’t care whether a woman is their leader, as long as she has their values.

Western leftists are probably going to be especially vexed at Takaichi’s election, particularly the ones who claim a particular kinship with the Japanese, due to popular misconceptions that leftists peddle about Japanese culture because Japan is far enough across the ocean to avoid scrutiny so leftists could avoid being called out for their lies.

The fact is, the prevailing sentiment in Japan is that Japan is for the Japanese. It’s to the point that Japan doesn’t just have nationalists, they have ultra-nationalists. And if a western nationalist were to hear them speak, they’d probably tell them that they need to take it from a 10 to a 4.

As much as I like Japan, as I see it, the Japanese don’t have a obligation to give me a home there if I were to decide I wanted to live there. But if I did, I would leverage my job experience, college education, lack of criminal record, and that I have no desire to change Japan’s culture. I suspect that the typical leftist might have an issue with at least one of those data points. But no, I don’t suspect that one could successfully leverage with their taste anime, or their favorite Pokémon. Even if your favorite being Raichu indicates great taste.

And even if someone were to move there, that wouldn’t make a person Japanese. In fact, unless a person is genetically Japanese, they just won’t be considered Japanese, ever. There are families of Koreans who have lived in Japan for generations, and while they’re residents, they’re still not Japanese.

Now, you can settle down with a Japanese spouse. A traditional Japanese thinker might object or at least be begrudging about it, but that’s generally allowed. But you still wouldn’t be Japanese. Your kid would be, but they’d probably get picked on by the other Japanese kids.

I don’t bring all this up to discourage or put anyone in a negative light, but just to give a realistic idea of what life in Japan would be like for a foreigner.

As I see it, Japan has a distinct cultural identity, and they have a right to defend it from cultures which have a proven track record of behaving belligerently towards other cultures.

Muslims. Muslims are the biggest threat to civility. Naturally, a people as heavily civilized as the Japanese would recognize Islam as a problem.

To any leftists reading this: Please don’t shoot her.

The Irish are angrier than usual.

Leave a reply

Things are popping in Ireland. Lotsa splodies. People are not very happy. It’s a mess and all that.

Let’s get into why the Irish are more pissed than usual. Actually, let’s see whether you can guess, before reading on.

Were you able to guess that it’s because of a Muslim migrant? Did you guess that it involved the rape of a little girl? If so, you probably didn’t think it was much of a guess. And if you want a prize, too bad. No one gets a prize for getting the free space on a bingo card.

The Irish broke out into protests that quickly turned violent in and around Ireland’s capital of Dublin, and particularly outside of the migrant hotel that housed the migrant.

The phrase “migrant hotel” shouldn’t even be in the vernacular. Those just shouldn’t exist.

The Irish aren’t just pissed because a child was violated by a migrant, but also because the choice was made back in March that he should be deported. But he remained in the country anyway, so the crime should not have even happened. And even after it did, the Irish government decided to continue housing the migrant at a migrant hotel at taxpayer expense, and fund his legal defense, also at taxpayer expense.

I’m pissed, and I’m all the way over here.

Now, if you thought that the Summer of Love riots after George Floyd’s overdose death were bad, the Irish are close to outdoing them in just a few hours. In that time, they have set fires, including to at least one police vehicle, and in at least one case, protesters have succeeded in driving back police in riot gear. A new water cannon was deployed, but reportedly not yet utilized.

The riots are about what you would expect from a people with a history of fighting tooth and nail in entirely hopeless wars of defense.

Notice how the left isn’t giving this any attention, despite its potential to be used as an example of right-wing violence? That’s because this is the kind of thing they’re afraid of. If the people with grievances over their heritage being given away to those with no love for it were to find out that they’re not alone, then the right could end up growing to something more than a controlled token opposition.

And that’s one of the main reasons why I don’t believe that the ultra-wealthy political left is stoking this conflict on purpose as part of a Hegelian manipulation strategy. But if a person thought that, I’d understand why they would. What did the establishment left really think would happen when trafficking in legions of migrants from part of the world where the predominant religion thinks pederasty is okay, and that uncovered women in public are valid targets?

The reason why we have problems like this is because those with the most power to change society are isolated from the consequences of their own policies. They live in their own gated communities, not in cities or neighborhoods near migrant hotels which, in Ireland, have crime rates 30 times higher than what’s typical for most of Ireland.

The obvious thing that one would expect to happen did happen, and it was followed by the obvious response. But as of now, it’s still a developing story.

But it should be obvious that we’re only seeing the beginning of what’s to come. People are getting fed up with the stupid bullshit, including the import of those with no love for our society and culture.

If you’re someone who thought that the mass migration of Muslims was a good idea, you are an absolute moron. You have no capacity for being a positive asset to society. You should be disallowed from voting or otherwise influencing public policy, ever again.

If you bring people in from cultures that believe that its normal for people to do a certain thing, don’t be shocked when those people do that thing.

Let’s be realistic, here. I don’t expect any western politicians to change their policies. It’s fully expected of them to never admit that they were wrong, all while clinging to power for as long as possible, and even doubling down on the policies that are destroying culture and society, not only because they hate these things, but also to spite the people who they govern.

But something has got to give.

People don’t seem to comprehend just how significant it is that the hippie generation is about to pass away.

Leave a reply

Yesterday, when commenting on the makeup of the No Kings protest, I pointed out how the vast majority of those in attendance are aging boomers who are just a few years away from not voting anymore.

Since then, I got to thinking about why people joined the hippies, and why people go furry or trans, and as one thought led to another, I began seeing connections, and they seemed to hold up well when considering matters in the broad strokes of recent history.

The recent shooter of Charlie Kirk didn’t surprise anyone when it turned out that he was a leftist. But what was surprising is that he came from a Mormon family, though he turned against his family’s viewpoints, turning hard towards the left. What’s more, he was at least adjacent to the furry community, and was in a homosexual relationship.

Traditional thinking goes that people who are raised in a religious household will maintain said household’s religious beliefs into their adulthood. But in many cases, such as the case of Bulge Rat (Tyler Robinson), they turn against the culture they were raised in.

If you were to study certain communities, such as the trans community and other left-wing communities, you may notice an unusual number of people who grew up in religious households. And, not only that, the households tended to be strict to the point of suffocating the child’s individuality.

For example, Jews can be heavily legalistic, to the point that some refuse to keep beef and cheese in the same refrigerator. The Mormons tend to be strict in their own way. They tend to stock up on non-perishible food, in case the end-time tribulation were to begin tomorrow. I’ve heard of kids who weren’t allowed to watch cartoons or play sports during the Sabbath.

When these kids become old enough to decide for themselves, they often tend towards communities that permit them to express their individualities, sometimes towards communities that are extremely liberal. And whats more, they tend to harbor extreme resentment for their respective families, and for the religions which they saw as stifling their childhoods.

Now, consider the boomer generation, which gave us hippies. Do you suppose that they came from a religious background? I think that’s natural to guess. The generation that preceeded them saw two world wars, and the development of atomic weapons. Considering this, the WW2 generation would have likely believed that the world was about to end. That’s understandable considering that those two world wars saw the deployment of the worst weapons that were available at the time, and shortly afterwards, nuclear weapon stockpiles grew to the point that all of humanity could be wiped out multiple times.

In the face of such annihilation, it’s natural to expect people to lean into their religions. But as parents became overly strict, there would come to be a backlash.

It should be understood that not everyone in a generational group lives up to the stereotypes associated with their respective groups. I see people eschew these stereotypes all the time. But it seems as though the boomer generational group has a disproportionate amount of people who have a distaste for religion, Christianity in particular. In light of this, it’s easy to see why the boomers gave us hippies, and a disproportionate amount of them are sexual libertines.

Their influence on society is difficult to understate. It’s largely due to them that children in the western world today tend to be viewed as an inconvenience rather than a treasure. What’s more, you’d have to search pretty hard to find western made entertainment media which portrays marriage and family in a positive light.

As a consequence of the choices of boomer era liberals, families were broken, communities became more dangerous, societies more dysfunctional, and nations on the verge of falling apart. But while this is obvious to just about everyone else, the liberal boomers obstinately refuse to admit that they were wrong, because they don’t want to go anywhere close to admitting that their religious parents were right.

But what they’re refusing to admit, subsequent generations are learning, resulting in a shift to the right. This shift will become more pronounced as the hippie generation passes away. That is guaranteed.

For those who need to know, parents without a religion tend to be far worse than those with one, by a considerable amount. Not only do they view their children as an inconvenience, there is no moral check on their narcissism, and they’ll only grudgingly show kindness towards their children, usually because they feel an obligation (birthdays, Christmas, etc.). And go ahead and pity the child in such a household when it’s time to punish them. In corporal punishment, the parents tend to go ape shit, and outside of that, their tendency to run their household like a dictator becomes more pronounced.

It’s in light of the left’s tendency to oppose Christianity that their simultaneous advocacy for homosexuality and Islam is easier to comprehend. When left to its own devices, Muslims will kill gays, because they view homosexuality as a sin that merits capital punishment. Obviously, the groups involved cannot be reconciled in the long term. However, each has at least a slight opposition to Christianity.

If it sounds like leftism is a huge anti-Christian club, that’s because it pretty much is. Remember that the term “left” as relates to political affiliation goes back to enlightenment era France, where those who were more traditional and more pro-Christian tended to sit on the right side of the house of representatives, while those who opposed them tended to seat themselves to the left. The political battle that we see today is part of a war that’s been going on for centuries.

As I see it, though, the war might finally be coming to an end, and it looks like conservatives are definitely going to win. Not only is a hugely left-wing generation on the verge of passing away, they’ve shown the obvious outcomes of their experimental ideas, and have left an example that inspires disgust.

And if the hippies are seen in a negative light today, they are definitely not going to be viewed favorably by future generations who will view the record of them with hindsight.

Did the No Kings protest indicate a shift in the political tide?

Leave a reply

To get right to the answer to the question in the title, yes, the No Kings protest does indeed indicate a shift in the political zeitgeist. But not in the way that people expect.

To understand what I’m getting at, here’s a pic from the protest just a couple days ago:

Do you see it? Here’s another:

See it yet? But we’re not done yet:

And another:

There’s more:

Wait, how’d that get in there? My mistake. Here’s another:

And more:

That one was a little on-the-nose, but you probably get the point. But for those who think I might be cherry picking, here’s one with a lot of people in frame, which you can save to your device and zoom in on, examining at your leisure:

The overwhelming majority of these crowds are retirement age leftists, which, in some cases, turned out in large numbers.

Left-wing social media personalities are pointing at the numbers, and are making them out to be some victory. Because of course they would. If the left’s cheerleaders aren’t making their following feel good, then their following will find someone who does.

But those numbers are not the victory that the left is making it out to be, especially in light of the fact that, however many leftists  mobilized when summoned, they were still outnumbered by the people who voted in the current president, by popular vote no less.

But that they’re currently outnumbered is not my point. And if you still don’t get it, then consider the following question: Where were all the young people?

It’s an important question, considering that the political zeitgeist is already swinging to the right, and quite heavily in some regards. How much more momentum do you suppose the right is going to gain when all those retirement age leftists age out, not just from working, but also from voting?

We all know the joke: that the dead vote Democrat. But to get serious, we might be on the verge of a major swing to the right, much greater than what we’ve been seeing recently, what with people coming to understand the second order consequences of left-wing policies. If all the people who show up to protests in an attempt to relive their pasts are an indication, a previous generation of leftists are going to leave a bunch of younger right-wingers to determine policy, and a swing to the right that we’ve been seeing in recent times is going to gain a lot more momentum.

To further drive the point home, traffic to sites of corporate media outlets, which tend to have a left-wing bias, is continuing their plunge:

Which makes sense considering that the people who trust them are hugely from the generation that is currently dying out. If there’s a characteristic fallacy of the boomer generation, it would be appeal to authority, though it’s selectively applied, as fallacies often are. It’s their tendency to be less skeptical of the things the people on the TV say.

While there are exceptions, people in the boomer generation haven’t done much to exhibit skepticism. To be fair, that seems to happen when people age. If you’ve had to tell someone not to open strange links or email attachments from people they don’t know, it was probably someone from that generational group.

And when you know that people tend to be more gullible as they age, it’s easy to see why legions and legions of old people have shown up in droves to express the delusional belief that the president that was voted in by electoral college and popular vote is actually a monarch.

That these people influence public policy says a lot about the state of the left.

Collargate

Leave a reply

One of the things women learn about dating is to pay attention to how their suitor behaves with those whom they perceive as having an advantage over.

This includes wait staff, the family that they already have, and, of course, animals.

The reason for this is because any indication of abuse from a man would be a strong indication of the abuse a woman would look forward to if she were to enter into a committed relationship with him.

I bring this up because Hasan Piker, one of the biggest breadtubers, is now facing accusations of using a shock collar on his dog live on stream, for the mere crime of fidgeting.

Here’s the footage associated with the accusation:

As Hamas… I mean, Hasan… is talking about violence, his dog gets up, and begins to walk off. Hamas… uh, Hasan… begins to yell at the dog.

Even without the shock collar, this pisses me off. Dogs move around. That’s what they naturally do, and it comes as naturally for them as barking at squirrels. There’s nothing wrong with this. In fact, dog owners have a duty to frequently walk them. That’s a normal part of having a dog.

If you own a dog and don’t even allow it to be a dog, what are you even doing?

Notice how Hamas… You know what? I’m tired of correcting myself when I accidentally call Hasan “Hamas”. He’s a Hamas supporter, so the shoe fits. Let’s get comfortable with calling him “Hamas Piker”.

Notice how Hamas reaches for something just off-camera, then the dog lets out a loud yelp. Hamas’ motion is consistent with pressing a button on a remote device as the dog yelped.

In a subsequent video that Hamas made in his defense, he pointed out that the dog yelped because it clipped its paw on the edge of a table. But we can see the footage. At the instant the dog yelped, we saw its paws, and they were not being injured by anything.

In my opinion, shock collars should be banned, which they are in some countries. The idea of exercising precise control over a small animal with the threat of torture at any given instant is messed up.

And what upset Hamas so much that he yelled at his dog and zapped it? It wouldn’t sit still in-frame, like the good little set piece that he probably viewed it as.

Then, to drive the point home how messed up Hamas is, he then went on a rant about how spoiled the dog is, and how it wants to roam about the house. Like I said before, dogs need to move. Walking the dog is a thing for that reason. But apparently what Hamas thinks his dog needs instead is “structured, regimented” discipline so the poor thing would know to sit still so it wouldn’t ignite his peevishness.

This is the kind of thing that tends to be lethal to streaming careers. You might remember Rich of ReviewTechUSA, and how he fell off. His own daughter wanted to be put to bed while he was streaming. The right thing to do would have been to leave his chair empty in the time it took for him to do his duty as a parent, and his viewers would have understood, and may have even found it heartwarming.

But Rich was not a good dad. He shooed his daughter away, so he could keep right on streaming. This pissed off his viewers.

Of course, it doesn’t help his daughter that there’s footage of her dad floating around on the internet wherein he was playing with his own nipples because people were paying him to do so.

To get back to talking about Hamas, I doubt I would have otherwise remembered him in a few years. For one thing, because I’m already getting his name wrong. But also because I have blended memories of him and another streamer named Density… I mean, Destiny. Okay, maybe I’ll call him Density. Hamas and Density are functionally identical in that they are leftist ideologues and champagne socialists, both breadtubers that are practically indistinguishable and superfluous in respect to one another. It was as though they were identical clones, spit out of the same machine.

But now, Hamas has something that sets him apart, which makes him distinct from his ideological mitosis siblings, but the image of mistreating dogs is not a good look. He was better off being virtually indistinguishable from any other overpaid cheerleader for the left-wing violence machine.

If he’s your hero, then just what are you doing?

Pokémon’s latest shiny distribution is being grossly mishandled.

Leave a reply
Image from eBay, sadly.

Let’s hear it for the highest grossing intellectual property in all of human history, because they have really done it this time.

Starting Friday, September 26th, a special distribution event for special characters for Pokémon Scarlet and Violet was to commence. This event made shiny variants of special legendary Pokémon available to players, and which one they got depended on the version of the game that they played. It was Koraidon on Scarlet version, and Miraidon on Violet version.

For most of the world, the event went well. But for the distribution in the US at GameStop locations, the distribution ran into problems, quickly. Really quickly.

I have my own experience, but I’ll save it for the end, because it might be infuriating, depending on who you are.

Here’s how the event was supposed to work: players who visited GameStop could request a scratch-off code card, which they got for free, no purchase necessary. Then, the code could be redeemed on a Scarlet or Violet game, and the shiny legendary that the player got depended on which version they were playing on. And GameStop benefitted from increased foot traffic, which is great for retail outlets. Everybody happy, except for those who hate Pokémon and the people who play it, but life has always sucked for the haters.

Now, for how it really went. I probably only need to tell you the limiting factor, and you’ll probably figure it out from there.

There was a strict allocation of only 50 code cards per store.

Yeah. To put that into perspective, there are GameStop locations that sold over a thousand combined copies of Scarlet and Violet.

Many stores ran out of code cards in the first hour, which is ridiculous considering that the distribution was intended to last for weeks. If you weren’t among those who were in as soon as the store opened, you probably had to do without.

And this is in spite of some stores limiting the distribution of codes to one per customer. Remember how I said that more than one legendary was made, and which one you got depended on which version the code was redeemed on? A limit of one per customer means that many players only got one, even if they got both versions, like many of the huge fans do. That would really suck for players who wanted both legendaries, because they’d only get one, assuming they got a code at all.

As was the case with scalpers who swooped in and hoovered up the code cards for shiny variants of the Sword and Shield legendaries, so it was this time, but worse. They proceeded to hock them on eBay for a quick buck, while screwing over the hobby that’s enjoyed by many millions of fans. Currently, the codes are going for around $30. To put that into perspective, a new copy of Scarlet or Violet is $60 (prior to the DLC package, which might bring it to $95).

As far as I could tell, the US is the only country that has this problem, which suggests that the problem is with GameStop. In other countries, the method of distribution may vary, but based on what I’ve heard, it generally goes that players could request a code, it gets printed on a receipt, and there’s no limit to how many codes can be printed.

Which is a far better way to handle the distribution, even if a little clunky. But why do codes, at all? Why not do it through geolocated distributing through the mobile version of Pokémon Home? Did The Pokémon Company forget that one of their biggest mobile apps has this feature? Or, why not use Pokémon Pass? Did The Pokémon Company forget that they developed a mobile app specifically to handle this kind of situation?

There is some good news, however. GameStop has announced on X that they are getting more codes to aid in the distribution. And this time, they will be printed on receipts, like the distribution is handled in some other countries.

That’s great, right? That means an unlimited number of codes, ensuring that players who make it to GameStop before the event ends can get at least one code, right?

Except no, because the codes are once again limited to 50 per store. Even though the codes are printed, and therefore, should be without limit.

So, with 100 total codes per store, and 2325 GameStop locations in the US, this means that there are only 232500 codes distributed. Which sounds like a lot, until you consider what the sales numbers for the games likely are. I don’t know what the US sales numbers are, but the global sales for the Scarlet and Violet versions are over 26 million. Using that number, less than 1% of players got at least one code. But considering only US sales, I imagine the number is closer to 5%. But 1 in 20 doesn’t sound like satisfying demand.

It actually gets worse. The first day of the distribution, September 26th, just so happened to be the release date for 3 different TCG expansions. One of which was for the Pokémon TCG, so scalpers were already doing what they were gonna do, the code cards would have been a little extra money in the bank.

There was some Magic: the Gathering crossover with Spider-Man. I haven’t played the game in decades, so I don’t know what is up with some of these crossovers, some of which don’t seem thematically appropriate.

There was also some flipping Yu-Gi-Oh! expansion that at least one person hypothetically cares about.

GameStop basically spent an hour or two being a Disneyland for TCG scalpers, and code cards for distribution of shiny Pokémon were getting swept up in the hurricane.

So how it ended up going is that a distribution of characters that are digital, and could therefore be limitlessly multiplied, had arbitrarily low allocations placed upon them for no apparent reason, except maybe to spite players.

I said that I’d share my own experience, so here we go. On September the 26th, at about the time GameStop was opening, I was already out for something else. So, knowing about the distribution, I went to a GameStop. There was only a handful of people there.

I shopped around for a bit, thinking that if I were to buy something, that would be a little something extra to come away with. As I was shopping, I overheard someone asking for a code card. He got one. So, I asked for one, too. I got one. Then, I asked if I could get one more. I got a second. Cool!

I kept shopping, but none of the anime toys marketed to grown-ups caught my eye. So I left, two code cards in hand.

After I got home, I redeemed them, one for Violet, and one for Scarlet. After that, I found out on YouTube just how rare those code cards are.

Please don’t hate me. I had no idea the distribution would turn into such a fiasco.

Jake Sanford: From a Foolish Choice To a Final Outcome

Leave a reply

The dust is settling over the LDS church attack that occurred on Sunday. With what’s known about the attacker, I’ll go ahead and make some sounds about it.

But before getting into it, there’s something that I sometimes do when it comes to people who commit particularly infamous crimes: strip them of their old name and brand them with a new one. The guilty party behind the Michigan LDS church attack was previously known as Jake Sanford.

His new name is Dork Dynasty.

On Sunday morning, Dork Dynasty, a 40-year-old Iraq War veteran, rammed his pickup truck into an LDS church, and afterwards got out and began firing on church attendees, while setting fire to the building with the aid of an accellerant. Police showed up and put an end to the rampage, as well as Dork Dynasty himself.

Currently, there are four known fatalities, eight injured, and the LDS building itself was a total loss. Because the LDS is rich, they probably don’t care much about the building.

As for what could have motivated the attacker, leftists behaved predictably. The moment that a MAGA sign was spotted in his yard, and American flags were spotted on his truck, they were all like, “Look! Right-wing violence! That’s gotta be it!” They then plugged their ears and hummed loudly, insisting on hearing no more. Because after incident followed by incident of recent left-wing violence, in their minds, they needed a singular incident of right-wing violence to convince themselves that the other side does it, too.

I could easily debunk them, but who would I really be convincing? No one believes that this was political violence, including the people who say it was. Except the ones who do, who would probably max all their credit cards for NFTs, if left unsupervised.

Interestingly, a politician recalled meeting Dork Dynasty prior to the attack while canvassing. He said that he recalled that his conversation with Dork Dynasty started mundane, but Dork Dynasty pivoted to the Mormon church and what he saw as wrong with them. The politician said that at that point in the conversation, he didn’t know how to answer in a way that was safe, knowing that with this kind of person, it can be difficult to tell what response can set them off.

When I heard this, I felt glad that I no longer work in grocery or retail, or with the general public.

He went on to say that when he saw the attacker’s face on TV, he recognized him as the person he had spoken to, days prior.

Here’s the video:

While the actions of Dork Dynasty were messed up, let’s be honest about the Mormon religion. Mormonism is messed up. But there’s a wrong way to deal with it, and there’s a right way.

Dork Dynasty showed us the wrong way, which enables the victimizing ideology to position itself as the victim, which they can use to present themselves as martyrs, with all the optics that comes with an ideology of martyrs. Considering the huge boost that conservatism got from the martyrdom of Charlie Kirk, Dork Dynasty should have known better.

At this point, even people whose primary source of information is state media are hearing about who Charlie Kirk was.

A better way of defeating Mormonism is by telling people what they really believe, and not just the sugar-coated version that’s presented by Mormons themselves.

For example, I heard about a guy who was considering Mormonism, but then took his own life. When his father asked whether they believed his son was in Heaven, they told him no, but that he was burning in Hell because he took his own life. That may be a belief that they sincerely have, but it’s a messed up thing to tell a grieving family.

I suspect that if Mormonism didn’t tell their members such a thing, that may have become one of the main reasons that the Mormons would have lost members. Because death is better than being in that cult.

If people were more discerning, the writings of Joseph Smith would have all the theological significance of Sonichu.

But as for Dork Dynasty, he’s dead now.

Tyler Robinson: A Mind Destroyed By Hatred

1 Reply

The dust hasn’t settled yet, but I’m going for it, anyhow. The feature of the latest installment of Throw Life Away Over Stupid Bullshit, Tyler Robinson.

There’s something that I like to do with people who become especially infamous, and that’s give them a fitting and derisive nickname. One of Tyler’s bullet casings had a message inscribed upon it, which reads, “notices bulges oWo what’s this”. Tyler expressed in a text message the fear that the message would be discovered, as though it were something he would be ashamed of. And because he’s furry-adjacent, a critter term would be somewhat fitting.

Therefore, his new name is Bulge Rat.

Bulge Rat would be the fuck belch who assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of his family and thousands of event attendees. Much to the profuse denial of leftists everywhere, this is yet another example of extreme left-wing violence inspired by left-wing ideology.

I suspect that most of the people who say that it was a case of a MAGA chud killing another MAGA chud don’t actually believe it, but as for the ones that do, they are simply pitiable. The world must be a confusing place for someone so gullible. It’s confusing for the rest of us, but more so for them.

You couldn’t be blamed for wondering why the left lies so blatantly against overwhelming evidence that is against them. It actually goes together with why leftism is so attractive for the slow-minded and middle-of-the-road thinkers: leftism is less concerned with whether a matter is true, and more with what furthers their own causes. This makes it easy to advocate for, because it doesn’t require moral consistency. People who are insincere about their professed beliefs usually have to at least try to remember what they said, in the event that someone may try to hold them to it. Leftism’s lack of moral consistency means less concern for the truth of a matter, freeing up mental resources for deceptive rhetoric that’s designed to catch people unprepared.

Also, did you really think that leftists would take accountability for the violence caused by their ideology? Particularly the social media influencers and pundits who have built their entire careers on the lies that they push?

Back to Bulge Rat, he came from a conservative household and once wore a Trump Halloween costume, and the bullshitters stop right there and just use that to say that he was a right-winger who killed another right-winger for not being right-wing enough, because apparently they believe that that’s what right-wingers do. Except they don’t, no one unironically believes that.

Okay, truth payload, coming in at your six. Ready? People who are in their twenties often have different views than when they were twelve. Yeah, shocker, right?

I mean, when my age consisted of a single digit, I thought that a fair world was when free stuff. But then I learned that stuff has to come from somewhere, so the world is more fair when you earn it. Like anyone who didn’t go on to become socialists.

Bulge Rat was a scholarship student with a 4.0 GPA, which goes to show that smart people are not always great people. In fact, when smart people go insane, their own substantial intelligence becomes weaponized against their own mind, and their human capacity for self-deception becomes magnified to terrifying extremes.

Initially, Bulge Rat had a bright future ahead of him. But then the mental destruction began. He was indoctrinated by left-wing politics, which convinced him to hate conservatives more and more. His family took notice. He even got himself a boyfriend, an MtF transgender who would be his roommate.

Then, his own destruction would become complete.

I’ve been completely honest with you until now, and I’m going to keep this up: There’s a lot that’s infuriating about this kid. The bombastic nature of his crime, which he carefully planned out, the reckless disregard for the people in attendance who were not his target, his indifference, not just for his target, but also his family who was in attendance, including his daughter who wanted to go to her daddy for comfort because she was afraid of the loud noise.

Bulge Rat’s execution should be televised. I had to see Charlie Kirk get shot on social media because of him, and now I want to see Bulge Rat take his medicine in front of a firing squad.

But the greatest revenge is seeing Bulge Rat’s attempt to destroy conservatism backfire spectacularly. For one thing, people are taking notice of Bulge Rat’s left-wing convictions, and they are disgusted by them. And not only that, people are taking note of the ghouls who are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and are disgusted by this, too. And because they’ve gone mask-off, employers are discovering that these are not the kind of people that they want around.

Consequence Culture at its finest.

But better still, a passion has been ignited for conservatism. To the point that, from what I’ve heard, church attendance has come way up!

If Bulge Rat had intended to destroy conservatism, he couldn’t have made a stupider or more self-defeating move.

When it comes down to it, we no longer live in an age where assassination is an effective strategy for defeating an ideology. For one thing, it’s nothing new that martyrdom can magnify a message. But now, in this age of social media, it’s trivially simple for a person to learn about the ideology of the one martyred, and for that ideology to gain new adherents. Social media further expedites this process by greatly expanding the potential reach of the ideology’s message.

What’s more, people today see assassination as an infuriating crime against intellect, a failure to effectively refute the martyr’s ideology in a marketplace of ideas. Assassination of a martyr signals desperation on the part of a competing ideology, one with less expectation to win an argument, so it instead chooses violence. And when it comes to that point, it becomes obvious that the assassin’s ideology and its adherents don’t have a sincere interest in a safe and stable society.

And when it comes down to it, leftism is a carefully constructed denial of reality. I mean, come on, they actually believe that men can become women. What more needs to be said? And when one of their own turns violent because he can’t win with reason, they’ll lie right to you and tell you that it’s right-wing on right-wing violence, in spite of the evidence that comes pouring out against their claims.

Which is exactly what they did when Jawvious shot up a Catholic school just last month, which was an act of transgender violence. Which itself was reminiscent of an earlier attack against another Christian elementary school in Tennessee. Why does this keep happening?

It was only days prior to the assassination of Charlie Kirk that people were outraged over the senseless murder of a Ukrainian refugee on a train. While the murder itself wasn’t motivated by politics, the revolving door justice system favored by left-wing judges and DAs certainly made the macabre scene possible.

Then there’s the George Floyd riots, when the left went ballistic over the overdose death of a junkie as he was being arrested. Or there’s the ironically-termed “Summer of Love”, which saw the looting and fiery destruction of businesses.

Or there was the “CHAZ” or “CHOP”, which was an attempt to secede from the United States, an attempt which pretty much fell apart within weeks, because leftists don’t know how to run an organized society, even when enabled by a parasitic relationship with the surrounding society.

The Russians and the Chinese must have been laughing so hard.

“Er, bUt, uHM, aKcshULLy…”

What, that the right commits violence, too? That the right needs to turn down the temperature, too? As though the right is just as responsible for the violence that is committed against them as the leftists who are committing it against them? I suppose next you’ll try saying that a rape victim is just as guilty as a rapist. Considering how much leftists coddle Islamists who actually believe that, I wouldn’t put it past them.

Or are you going to bring up the January 6th Capitol protest, a demonstration that got out of hand, and no one outside of the demonstrators themselves were killed during the demonstration?

It’s been five years since, and the left hasn’t come off it. That’s because it’s all they have to fuel the myth of the violent right, outside of lying, which includes falsely attributing left-wing violence to the right, which they have shamelessly and desperately have attempted to do. Or falsely grouping prison violence as right-wing violence, to bring those numbers up.

People are pissed that Charlie Kirk was killed, especially considering that he was the nice guy, the one who went up to his political opponents to talk. That was his thing. The event he was killed at, the entire idea was that anyone could go up to him and talk to him. He was killed for that, because he was so effectively vilified by his enemies.

He was actually discussing transgender violence when he was shot. By a transgender-adjacent homosexual. I know that coincidences happen, but if someone had the idea that the shooting was timed for such a question, I could understand that.

Sobering as it may be to think about, I think that more violence is likely to be committed by those taking up the cause for the transgender movement, and left-wingers in general. The left-wing radicalization pipeline is just way too effective to realistically expect otherwise. As for when it might happen, it’s difficult to say. But considering that about 2 weeks separated the assassination of Charlie Kirk from the shooting at a Minnesota church, it might not be long before the next leftist lunatic goes murder ‘tard.

And if those who celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk are any indication, there may be many, many more who might. And they apparently number in the tens of thousands.

But as for Bulge Rat, the guy was one of many whose mind was destroyed by the left-wing radicalization pipeline. Though he accused his political opponents of hate, Bulge Rat would prove that his own hatred would surpass anyone who he ever vilified.

However, Conservatives are motivated by something far more profound: Love. The real kind. The kind that realizes that there are things worth protecting and defending.

To leftists like Tyler Robinson, love is a word with strong emotional connotations with many definitions, which they equivocate between in an attempt to justify their own agenda. However, the leftist idea of love is tainted by deviance. This is why they don’t properly comprehend it.

They don’t understand hate, either. To them, it’s yet another emotionally charged word that they falsely attribute to their political opponents. But if they understood it, they would understand that it applies well to leftists.

Think about the things you love and cherish, those things that are worth fighting for and protecting. Those are among the things that give life its joy.

The left-wing experiment has failed.

Leave a reply

So, what happens when a media apparatus continually speaks of a political faction as though they’re Nazis, while their fellow political cultists say among themselves that the way Nazis are dealt with is to kill them?

It’s not a trick question. The answer is obvious. And we saw how a depraved, lunatic mental deficient answered it when they killed Charlie Kirk.

And to confirm that the dead-enders have arrived at a consensus on this, many of them have taken to social media to celebrate the murder.

As I see it, they can go right on going mask-off, because we’re screen-grabbing, hitting record, and then comes whatever it is that comes next for them, because freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.

But apparently, they think it’s okay to murder people who have better viewpoints than they do. And they’ll do so while justifying themselves in their own warped heads by insisting that Charlie was some kind of extremist, something that Charlie Kirk definitely wasn’t.

In reality, he was regarded as a middle-of-the-road conservative. Personally, I see him as an actual conservative, and the groypers and their ilk have benefitted too heavily from the idea that they’re more to the right. The fact is, Charlie Kirk was right-wing, while the Nick Fuentes types are some fringe group that more reasonable people should stay away from.

But going back to the intellectual dead-ends who are celebrating the murder, they really shouldn’t. They have no idea the sleeping giant that has just awakened. People are pissed. And they are now aware that the left-wing experiment has failed.

We know that when someone like Charlie Kirk comes along, who just wants to talk, their enemies will try to kill them. The entire point of the event that Kirk attended was for anyone to go up to him and ask him questions. And he’d talk to them. It was an open forum.

And yet, he was killed for it. In so doing, his enemies (and ours) have demonstrated that they are not people who can be reasoned with. And that is not an image you want for your movement, because things tend to go badly for any movement like that, particularly for its foot soldiers and useful idiots.

At this point, we still don’t have the perp. It’s probably not going well for him. We’d be getting into speculation, but I suspect that he probably took his own life at this point. That’s often how it goes for situations like this: the offender commits whatever crime he does, then afterwards, for one reason or another, he takes his own life. Maybe out of guilt, maybe to avoid the consequences. But whatever the reason, people who commit crimes like this often take their own lives.

We have information that the gun may have been retrieved, apparently wrapped in a towel and discarded in the woods. It would seem the bullet cases have anti-fascist memes written on them.

Imagine my shock.

It’s likely that it was yet another violent transgender defect behind this murder. As I’ve pointed out before, these people get dangerous when they feel like they are backed up into a corner, which is probably how they are feeling now, now that their ridiculous ideology is losing in public opinion.

If it turns out that the killer is yet another trans radical, their movement is only going to look worse, resulting in them losing yet more ground. Thus, they may turn to yet more violence.

It’s difficult for me to find something to say on the matter that hasn’t already been said, so there’s two points that I’d like to give more attention.

First, the conspiracy theorists should sit this one out. Right now, we need the truth, not their inane nonsense.

Second, and more importantly, consider what you love and what you fight for. Whether it’s family and friends, or simple pleasures, remember what it is you enjoy. We enjoy life, which is one of the reasons we find strength to continue on. The people who hate us would deny us joy and happiness. Perhaps the finest thing you can do to spite the people who hate you is to enjoy life, and the things which are special to you.

But when it comes to the people we take issue with, “love” is not something that they understand. It’s a word that they use because they know that they could use it to manipulate and justify any behavior that they want to justify. But they’ve only been fooling themselves.

Whether the left admits it or not, it’s obvious now that their experiment has failed. Their vision for the world has been built on a foundation of lies and deviance. Among those left who still believe in it, too many are acting out what it leads to, and that’s been becoming increasingly difficult to deny.

But as for those on the right, we would do well to know that any instance of poor judgment on our part is likely to be magnified many times, by virtue of the fact that the left still has control of state-sponsored media. It’s something we should be used to by now, that we are held to a far higher standard.

It feels like we’re living in a different world, now. Be vigilant. It’s becoming an increasingly necessary virtue.

What an absolute disgrace.

Leave a reply

A murder aboard a train in North Carolina has caught the attention of many on social media, who in turn noted the lack of coverage in corporate mainstream media outlets. What’s especially catching the attention of people around the world is how senseless, callous, and preventable the murder was.

The murder was caught on camera, and was afterward shared online.

The suspect of the crime, Decarlos Brown Jr., had previously been arrested 14 times. That wasn’t a typo, prior to the murder, he was arrested 14 times. Apparently, each time Decarlos proved he was a dangerous miscreant, with charges such as felony larceny, assault, and robbery with a dangerous weapon, it was decided that he would be released back into the public, where he would have an opportunity to offend again, a total of 14 times.

And if he were released a 15th time, it wouldn’t surprise me.

The video of the incident is below. Though the completion of the murder is omitted, the following footage is disturbing.

Iryna Zarutska had previously fled the country of Ukraine, which was at war with the country of Russia. One might think she would have been safe in the city of Charlotte, in the American state of North Carolina. However, this would prove to not be the case.

Prior to Iryna’s boarding of the train, Decarlos is seen appearing visibly distraught. When Iryna boarded, she took a seat in front of Decarlos. Decarlos took note of this, and after a pause, produced a pocket knife, which he then unfolded with careful deliberation. After another moment, he stood up and carried out his savage attack on Iryna, who did not see it coming.

There was absolutely no indication that Iryna had done anything to provoke the attack. It seemed completely senseless.

After completing the attack, Decarlos then calmly proceeded down the cabin, still holding the knife in his hand. As he did so, blood dripped from the knife, leaving drops on the floor.

As he did so, some of the other passengers appeared to take note that something was amiss. The victim, having just been slain, had caught their attention, and they took note of the blood on the floor.

On the other end of the cabin, Decarlos calmly removed his hoodie, and wrapped it around his hand which was still carrying the knife, perhaps an attempt to conceal his part in the crime he had just committed. He departed the train at a stop.

The passengers in the video have faced some criticism for appearing to be either calm or indecisive in the video above. In my opinion, they cannot be faulted for their response. For one thing, there is a phenomenon called normalcy bias, where people in unusual situations maintain a tendency to continue to behave as though the situation were mundane, even if briefly, because for a moment they find it difficult to accept that there may be an unusual situation. Another reason may be indecision, or even panicking. Even if a person drills what they would do in an emergency, when an emergency occurs, it might occur in a manner different than how one might imagine, and thus, they might panic, or become indecisive.

In reality, it’s not realistic to expect ordinary people to behave like protagonists in action movies.

People all over the world have attempted to make sense of the murder. It seems a prevalent theory is that Decarlos had a mental illness, and that his violent act can be likened to “the bad voices winning.” Others point to his extensive criminal record, and say that his violent outburst was the inevitable outcome of allowing a person with a history of violence to roam free. Of course, both theories can be true.

Whatever the reason for it, it’s clear that Decarlos Brown Jr. is guilty of the crime we have video evidence of. But he is not the only one with guilt.

There are professions in which negligence should be considered criminal. To be fair, in most cases, it’s not a big deal. For example, if you order your meal at Wendy’s as dine-in, then get your meal in a bag, it’s not a big deal. However, if a doctor preps a patient for heart surgery, then the patient wakes up without an arm because they were mixed up with another patient, the negligence involved should be considered criminal.

So it is with those in criminal justice who continually release violent offenders who repeatedly commit recidivist offenses. They have failed the public, whose safety was in their hands. They must be held accountable.

I’ve noticed that many people have suggested creative punishments for Decarlos Brown Jr. As I see it, upon finding him guilty (which should be inevitable considering the preponderance of evidence against him), he should be put to death. His execution should be public, and carried out without delay.