Category Archives: Regressive Leftism

This is infuriating.

1 Reply

We knew that they had it in them. But they finally succeeded in suffocating that last trace of inhibition that was keeping them from acting on it.

Yesterday, mobs of leftists entered a church, disrupting services that were in progress, and they proceeded to spout leftist brainrot.

If you’re up for being infuriated, there’s video. Which a leftist took, because he was proud of what he did.

Because they possessed no sense of sanctity, the leftists thought nothing of disrupting a church service in progress with their loud, misinformed inanities. And, lacking normal compassion, they thought nothing of terrifying the children and the women who were in attendance.

In fact, they seemed to possess absolutely no capacity for comprehending just how bad the optics of their outrageous act would be. Did they really think that this brazen act of sacrilege would endear themselves to anyone? Was I supposed to see children in obvious fear, as these hooligans, whose ideology has a extant record of violence on the streets, intrudes upon a group of people who mind their own business in their lives, as they are worshipping?

And more infuriating still, these people without any sense of sanctity believe that they are in a position to tell someone that they are not a true Christian, and to lecture them as to what true Christianity is about. Which, according to them, centers perfectly around the mindrot activism which has destroyed their own temperance and better judgment.

By the way, if someone is trying to hold your beliefs against you by telling you what they should be, it’s valid to ask whether they actually believe what they’re saying. Because if not, then they are probably just trying to manipulate you.

When someone without any beliefs tries telling you what your beliefs are, they tend to be very wrong. And they probably can’t even relate to having strong convictions.

While I could easily say that their behavior was disgusting, I wish I could just as easily say that it was surprising. Leftists tend to have little respect for Christianity, so it’s not much of a shock that they would cross the line that the ones who interrupted a church service did.

So, what was their pretext for doing this? They believed that the pastor was an ICE agent. As you might have guessed, the incident took place in the current leftist cesspit of the US, Minnesota.

That’s right: The people who have demonstrated themselves to be impious freaks are, once again, the ones who are fighting so that people who shouldn’t even be in this country can continue stealing value from those who pay too much in taxes to begin with.

While the minds of the leftists are clearly psychologically damaged, it remains that they got the idea to do this from somewhere. It wouldn’t surprise me if the idea came from some foreign asset, or it was the latest consequence of social media manipulation. Remember that much of the internet is about convincing other people to do things.

Whatever the cause, I really don’t know where things go from here. If this matter deescalates, it would probably be because the attention would later pivot to some other issue with the potential to psy-op leftists into being dangerous fanatics.

But then, the underlying problem still wouldn’t be addressed. The left seems to be tending more and more towards violent extremism. And as time goes on, it seems as though there are fewer and fewer boundaries that they’ll be willing to respect.

They certainly wouldn’t benefit from the civil war that they seem to want. Maybe they will change their minds once they see the shelves completely bare, and be without electricity or internet for weeks at a time. They always did suck at comprehending the consequences of their own choices.

She just can’t bring herself to tell the truth.

Leave a reply

There are signs that we should all be on the lookout for that we should start looking for a different doctor. One is if the doctor is obese. That’s a classic red flag. Another is if they discourage a generic medication that is exactly the same as a name brand medication that they favor, and the office is packed with literature for that same brand.

Here’s a hypothetical scenario: Suppose a doctor referred you to either a gynecologist or a urologist. They referred you to the wrong one (the two are gender-specific), so you ask the doctor whether they know the difference between men and women. The doctor gets evasive, and refuses to answer the question.

Would you trust that doctor? The answer is “no”. Of course you wouldn’t. That’s the only correct answer.

Sadly, some doctors are left-wing cultists. One such example is Dr. Verma, who spent five minutes on the Senate floor evading the question of whether men can get pregnant:

Senator Hawley: “The goal is just the truth. So, can men get pregnant?”
Dr. Verma: “Again, the reason I paused there is because I’m not really sure of the goal of the question…”
Hawley: “The goal is just to establish a biological reality. You just said a moment ago that science and evidence should control, not politics. So, let’s just test that proposition. Can men get pregnant?”
Verma: “I take care of people with many identities, but, uh…”
Hawley: “Can men get pregnant?”
Vermin: “I take care of many women who can get pregnant, I do take care of many people that don’t identify as women…”
Hawley: “Can men get pregnant?”

And so on for minutes.

Conservatives have been asking leftists to identify the difference between men and women for years, and leftists still haven’t come up with an answer. Even after all this time, the best that they can come up with is to get evasive.

It’s kind of like if roaches developed the atomic bomb. It’s like a weapon that only affects one side, while the other is immune. When deployed, one side is unaffected by the fallout, while the other can do nothing more than seek shelter, and not come out for weeks.

The problem with leftists is that they’re in a cult. And it’s a cult with a strict blasphemy code. The moment that they say anything that has any potential to be interpreted as wrongthink, even accidentally, they get excoriated by their coreligionists. Even if they profusely apologize for years on end, they are never fully forgiven.

They put on the veneer of intellectualism, but they are not empiricists. The moment that you present them with a demonstrable, observable reality that goes contrary to one of their core doctrines, they do anything to avoid telling us what the rest of us see.

Not because they would have to admit that they were wrong, though it may be true that their personal pride would not permit this. It’s because they would be sentenced to many, many lashes by their own peers if they were to say the wrong thing, and may face being defrocked.

While we may laugh at their stupidity, what’s sobering about this is that leftists like Dr. Verma are still in a position where they can have an impact on the way people live. Any power that they have should be taken from them, and they should be reduced to the social pariahs that they should have been regarded as to begin with.

Late Stage Taxation

Leave a reply

Lately, I’ve been thinking more and more about Mike Judge, and how it seems as though he was trying to warn us.

You’ve probably heard of the nineties film, Idiocracy. To summarize: a man was deemed to be completely average. Most relevant to the plot, he had average intelligence. He was then cryogenically suspended for 500 years.

At the time he was released, every other person on earth was so stupid that he was easily the world’s smartest man. It was to the point that people thought that the right way to hydrate the ground for agriculture was with sports drinks, resulting in a famine because they were salting the ground.

The popular notion about natural selection is that it’s survival of the fittest. But that’s actually not true. In reality, it’s survival of the most adapted. And this is still relevant for humans, because a major shift in society brings with it a shift in selection pressures.

Society is in trouble today, for a reason similar to how people ended up stupid in Idiocracy. In current society, selection pressures favor the stupid.

Consider how intelligent people start a family. First, they prepare. They build a career by seeking an education, putting together a resume, then cultivating years of professional experience. They build credit, and look for a home and a car, and in many other ways prepare themselves. It takes years, but they eventually consider themselves viable for the dating market, into which they start to dip their toes. A problem with this approach is that it pisses away some of the most fertile years of one’s life, so by the time they consider themselves ready, they’re probably only going to have a few children, assuming they succeed in finding someone.

Stupid people don’t worry about any of that stuff. They have sex because there’s pleasure involved, then deal with the consequences, ready or not.

As you read through all this, you’re probably wondering what this has to do with the title. How does this relate to late stage taxation?

One thing I learned about people and myself from video games is that people act based on incentive, even if the playstyle results in an experience that’s different from what the game developers intended.

Someone playing Pokémon Gold might want a shiny legendary Pokémon. They might save in front of the Pokémon and soft reset until it appears as a shiny, then go to the frustrating task of trying to catch it, assuming they wouldn’t just huck a valuable Master Ball at it.

They could go to that trouble. Or they could catch an ordinary version of that legendary, arrange a box in a certain way, then use arbitrary code execution to make it shiny, possibly saving many hours.

The incentive is to try to obtain what’s desirable in little time, even if it means that the game is being played differently from how the developers intended.

This holds true in life, as well. When you account for incentives, people become a lot more predictable.

The political class is one example. If an incentive exists for them to pursue a certain policy, they can be counted on to pursue that policy. They might do this even if the result is a society with undesirable selection pressures, especially if they can avoid the brunt of those consequences.

For a politician, the incentive lies with whatever gets them more votes. This is easy to accomplish with entitlement programs. For one thing, the people who act on incentive to accept these programs are also incentivized to vote for the politician who enabled them.

What’s more, it’s a snap for that politician to maintain good optics with such a show of altruism. Of course, it’s not true altruism because it’s being funded through the coercion that is taxation, taking from those who actually produced value. However, there are multiple layers of abstraction separating the coercion from the false altruism, allowing everyone involved to maintain plausible deniability.

This is all pretty bad. But it gets worse. There are three parties with an incentive to increase entitlement programs further, as well as the number of people on the government dole:

  • Politicians, because they recognize that if people have an incentive to vote for them (free stuff), they’ll do so, cementing more power around those politicians,
  • The bureaucratic state, because as more people are getting free stuff, there will be more money to scrape away to pay those who manage it, and
  • Ordinary people, because they’d be getting more and more free stuff, without having to pay for it.

In fact, someone is paying for it: the productive class. Their incentive is to resist this massive theft. But as the political class have more and more people legally bribed, the productive class can do less and less about it.

And as the incentive to join the productive class dwindles, fewer people will want to join it. But as this happens, less is produced. Thus, there is less value to extract from the few left who are actually producing it.

As working Americans’ paychecks are being taxed into a black hole, they’re being convinced that they didn’t start a family when they wanted to due to a failure on their part.

All this is a recipe for a collapse of a society, which is the expected outcome as this continues.

As the birth rates of native populations collapses, politicians don’t take accountability for their contributions to the problem. That is not where their incentives lie. Rather, their incentive is to further expand their political power by replacing the native population with a migrant population, whose loyalty can be bought with value extracted from the already distressed native population.

Thus, the productive class who are already heavily taxed have a far more backbreaking burden placed upon them.

We already have a publicized example of what can happen when such corruption reaches an advanced state: the recently publicized Minnesota Somali entitlement scams. As was famously exposed by a citizen journalist, entire buildings had numerous empty daycare and Medicare offices, which weren’t doing much of anything, and all refused to assist the journalist in their respective alleged professional capacities. All while still accepting millions of dollars in funding taken from taxpayers.

One of which, famously, misspelled the word “Learning” on its sign.

This brought national attention to how funds are being misallocated in Minnesota. Minnesota governor Tim Walz dropped out of the race for reelection shortly afterwards, which wasn’t great optics for him.

To think that guy could have been the Vice President of the United States.

While the whole matter got widespread attention on social media, and action has been taken concerning this massive fraud, we’d be dreaming if we thought that something similar wasn’t happening all over the country, and not necessarily involving the same ethnic group.

In fact, this can be stated with almost complete confidence. Why? Because the leftist establishment involved with the Somali daycare fraud were acting on incentive, and the incentives to try something similar exists elsewhere, too. And when it comes to incentive, people are predictable.

I’ve mentioned intelligence and Somalis in the same article, I suppose I can give my opinion of Somali intelligence, seeing as it’s topical. Personally, I don’t see it as being as relevant as people make it out to be. After all, fraud is fraud, regardless of the intelligence of the person who commits it.

When I heard it said that the average IQ of a Somalian is 67, I was skeptical. After all, this is over two standard deviations below the mean, and well below the point where a person is too low to be allowed in the US armed forces. This is because it’s prohibitively difficult to train such a person to the point that they can carry out their duties autonomously.

Just imagine the implications for such a person if they were to attempt to enter the workforce. What is society supposed to do with such a person? It seems much of us have decided to grant them the means to live in relative comfort.

Even if one were to accept that intelligence has a genetic component, which seems to be the case, that there would be an entire country of people where most are low IQ to the point of being handicapped is a stretch to accept.

But it seems as though, whatever the intelligence of Somalis happens to be, this intelligence isn’t what was considered when the administrative state decided to use them as a pretext for extracting more wealth from productive Americans, or when Democrats decided to attempt to exploit them for votes, building power for themselves. But those same Somalis are predictable if they decided to move somewhere where they’d be given plenty of money, even if they accomplished nothing.

To be honest, I care less about the stupidity of Somalis than I do about the stupidity of Americans. And considering that there are Americans who are not only okay with the fraud, but are committing the felony of obstructing federal officers because they want it to continue, I imagine that our ancestors in their mud huts would wonder where things went wrong.

But tell them how selection pressures in late stage taxation favors the stupid, they’d probably wonder why anyone would allow matters to get to this point.

Another gullible person just died.

Leave a reply

Another FAFO happened. People are banging pots and pans together, giving those of us who like making fun of how ridiculous people can be plenty of material to work with.

What went down is that a woman was killed in Minnesota while resisting ICE officers. Her final mistake was accelerating towards an officer in her vehicle, ignoring repeated instruction to leave the vehicle. Recognizing this act of aggression as an attack with a 2-ton weapon, which was exactly what it was, the officer that was struck made it so that she’d never make another mistake.

And now, here we are, with millions of people who hate America and advocate for the rape of America telling you not to believe your lying eyes, because we have video of the incident from multiple different angles.

I’ll say first that nothing about this incident should really change your opinion of illegal immigration, whether you’re for it or against it. This incident pretty much came down to someone escalating matters beyond her ability to manage, then leaving the rest of us with a lesson to learn. A lesson that she herself doesn’t benefit from, because now she’s gone.

It’s wise to learn from your mistakes. It’s better to learn from other people’s mistakes.

The attacker was identified as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good. As is often the case when it comes to infamous criminals, her name is forfeit, and I get to give her a new one. Her new name is Renee Bad. She’s not around to enjoy it, so whether she would is irrelevant.

The 2:00 PM video from the post below is likely the one that you saw first, especially if you’re one of the few who are still informed by television.

The part that’s hyper-analyzed would be the 9 to 12 second portion, which shows that a federal agent was in front of the vehicle when Renee Bad shifted from reverse to forward (as indicated by the lights on her car changing), and she accelerated forward as the federal agent was still in front of her vehicle. The agent responded to this aggression by firing his pistol at the attacker.

Renee wasn’t using her head before, and now she definitely isn’t.

As we have seen in the last few days, leftists saw the video above, and saw something entirely different. In their thinking, the ICE agent was the clear aggressor, senselessly firing on a woman who was doing nothing wrong. Though we have the clear, plain video evidence, leftists still insist on their own manufactured reality, making this another case study in leftism being a carefully constructed denial of reality, a cult wherein each of the adherents prove their devotion to the ideology with how starkly they can deny the clear, plain evidence.

Again, nothing about this incident should have any bearing on policy regarding illegal immigration, other than in regards to the safety of agents carrying out their duties in an environment where they can be interfered with by violent cretins seeking social media headpats. The real problem is that protestors are becoming increasingly violent and then proceeding to play victim when facing the consequences for their own unwise behavior. Much of their behavior can likely be explained by them acting out encouraged by inflammatory rhetoric from social media influencers and those in the protestors’ online social circles. A stunted capacity for understanding right from wrong would easily explain the rest.

Much of online activism on the left comes down to trying to get other people to do things.

If you’re among the many who liked to lie to yourself about the video above, then the video below made it far more difficult for you to deceive yourself. It’s cell phone video from the ICE agent who was struck by the vehicle.

Prior to her decision to attack the ICE agent, Renee Bad was ordered to leave the vehicle by the officers a total of three times. At that point, it was already a non-compliance issue. Renee should not have been in her vehicle at the point that she decided to attack.

The video, taken from the perspective of the officer who was attacked, shows that he was in front of the vehicle at the point that Renee decided to accelerate. What’s more, you can hear a loud “thud” at the moment the vehicle collided with the agent.

There’s simply no room for denial.

But what I’d like to call attention to is the expression on Renee’s face right before she decided to accelerate towards the officer. The following image was taken from about 39 seconds into the video:

She’s looking right at the officer she was about to attempt to run down. And she had a big smile. She knew what she was about to do.

People have spoken of Renee Bad’s death as a tragedy. As I see it, the real tragedy occurred well before she decided that she’d be an activist instead of a mother that day. Over the course of an unknown amount of time, Renee was subjected to algorithmic manipulation and psychological operation which were so extensive, so corrosive and destructive, that it was able to override her better judgement. So effective was the emotionally loaded language, the one-sided arguments, and the deception that she was presented with, that she became a willing soldier for a people who weren’t her own, ready to literally fight in a war to continue a fraud that stole billions from people who actually were her own.

All this despite there being no benefit to her in persevering, whatsoever.

Some deaths are a tragedy. But sometimes, the world really is better off without certain people. And Renee was clearly one of those people. After all, what exactly was society supposed to do with someone who decided that, instead of caring for her family on a given day, she’d instead obstruct federal officers with a big smile, with apparently nothing to gain in so doing? And what kind of a future can a person be expected to have if they would decide that, instead of complying with law enforcement, she’d instead decide to attempt vehicular assault against them?

Could Renee have been redeemed? I don’t know. But if a person attacks a person who’s armed, especially if it’s law enforcement, with potentially lethal force, I doubt that redemption would be on that person’s mind.

I think it’s reasonable to guess that if she had survived that encounter, her life would have ended due to the consequences of a different unwise choice that she’d have made. With some people, it’s just a matter of time.

Speculation aside, Renee Bad is gone, now. The world has become slightly less stupid.

TWAT News: CNN and gambling.

Leave a reply

CNN is already famous for its journalistic integrity, so it’s natural to expect it to partner with prediction market website Kalshi.

If Kalshi sounds somewhat familiar, it’s probably because you’ve heard the name in passing when Polymarket was discussed.

Here’s Kalshi’s partnership announcement on X:

I like the term “prediction market”, by the way, because it’s a more Orwellian way of saying “gambling”.

Which I think gives us a pretty good understanding of how things are going for CNN after the abject failure of their streaming platform. They’re now partnering up with a gambling website.

Except, instead of a game of cards, the bets are on outcomes of current events such as elections. Which has lots of potential for a conflict of interest when you understand that CNN might report on an outcome that doesn’t fit the official narrative when there’s piles of their viewers’ money at stake.

We’re talking about the kind of people who went to school for years to become journalists only to end up writing articles like the kind touting cuckolding, if you’d trust their financial advise, you were probably going to lose that money somehow, anyway.

In case you’re wondering which of the two is on the bottom in the relationship, here’s a video of CNN with a scrolling Kalshi prediction tracker:

Simply pathetic.

At this point, it’s a valid question: Who the hell still watches CNN? My guess is that it’s the same credulous dimwits who heard the Russian collusion hoax, the Storm Daniels hush money story, and the Sandman defamation, and believed the people on their television screens without even the slightest trace of inquiry.

And now, CNN wants them to become addicted to gambling so they don’t lose the viewers that they have left.

Here’s the best take on this matter that I’ve seen that wasn’t one of my own:

Which gets me suspicious that insider trading may have just evolved into a form that gets around the law, at least for the time being.

But CNN has just partnered with a gambling website. That Was Actually The News.

More people should be talking about this.

Leave a reply

There was a House vote last week over condemning socialism. What does it do? From what I can tell, pretty much nothing, except condemn socialism.

It’s been made out to be a virtue signal by the right, but I think this reveals something significant, which I’ll get into.

You can see the results in the graphic above. What we see out of Republicans isn’t very surprising. Aside from the few who didn’t vote, their condemnation was unanimous. Republicans tend towards limited government and the free market, and it’s great to see them consistent with themselves in this regard.

But let’s get into something concerning that the vote reveals. Democrats should have also been unanimous in their condemnation of socialism. But they were split, nearly half-and-half.

The reason this is sobering is because Socialism is a heavily statist government philosophy which masquerades as an economic theory. It, along with its virtually identical butt-buddy communism, falls under the banner of Marxism. The previous century was the century of Marxism, and it was the bloodiest in all of human history, and it’s not even close. Where Marxism is implemented at scale, death also follows at scale.

The death counts were so high that the margins of error were in the tens of millions.

When asked whether you’d condemn socialism, the only correct answer is “yes”, and it should come emphatically and without hesitation. Yet, the Democrats were split on it, with more saying “nay” than “yay”.

Having a constituency to pander to is no excuse, considering that anyone holding office is expected to be among our intellectual betters, even if the constituency is not.

And, let’s be honest here, Marxists are generally not intelligent. If they appear to win a debate, it’s usually because they were up against someone who knows that Marxism is wrong, but didn’t properly prepare for the debate, likely because they thought that they’d find an easy grand-slam victory.

And the thing is, as stupid as Marxists may be, they’ve studied it extensively enough to present it to those who did not, and they were able to intuit the rules of rhetoric to be able to weild them deceptively against the unprepared.

And stupid people are Marxist for a reason: because capitalism is competitive, and that’s a game which they’d rather not play, because they don’t want to lose. They’d rather that everyone be at the same low level than for some people to be at high levels and some at low levels. Crabs in a bucket.

Let’s not kid ourselves here: some people just can’t succeed in a competitive environment. There’s this idea that everyone can be anything they want to be. It’s a fairy tale that helps people sleep at night. Sadly, some people are just going to work in fast food for years and years, and maybe struggle with it (and when you consider how the Dunning-Kruger effect works, they’ll probably still think they’re too smart for it).

Then along comes Marxism to sell them the pipe dream of equality of outcome. And because gullible people exist in immense numbers, tremendous amounts of bloodshed follow. And all the while, these same gullible people will believe that it’s because people aren’t cooperating.

Marxists are the flat-earthers of economic theory: they win by preying on the unprepared.

And they are a huge chunk of the Democrats constituency. And Democrats themselves don’t have the nerve to tell them that they’re wrong, and know that if they did, they’d split their own vote, and narrowly become a third party to a socialist party, if the above-mentioned House vote is any indication.

How close are we to seeing a repeat of the immense bloodshed of Marxism? I don’t know. It could happen as soon as the left takes control of the major branches of government, and might depend on whether they decide to kowtow to a huge portion of their constituency. And that could be just a few years from now.

NYC’s Wham Episode

Leave a reply

The financial capital of the world has just elected a Muslim socialist mayor, less than two-and-a-half decades after both World Trade Center towers were destroyed by a bunch of Muslims.

I know that people have a knack for not learning a damned thing, but come the fuck on.

But wow, what an intersection of mass-murdering ideologies, huh? Muslim and socialist, both at the same time. Imagine the aura of death that comes off of that guy.

I thought that it was legally not allowed for a person to hold office in the United States if they identified as a Communist, in the interest of national security. But it seems they can get around this by instead claiming to be socialist, which is basically identical.

The left practicing equivocation? Imagine my shock!

New York City voters, with the help of a huge number of voters who resided in the city for less than ten years, has just voted in Democrat Zohran Mamdani, who in a recent interview avoided condemning the phrase “globalize the intifada”.

If you’re wondering what “the intifada” is, that’s the repeated bombing of mass transportation, and other terror attacks, in Israel. Mamdani avoided directly condemning that, rather than flat out calling the intifada wrong, like any sane man who knows what that is, especially when presented with the prospect of globalizing that bullshit.

So now, the country is split between those who want to speedrun the destruction of western civilization, and those who want to save them from themselves. Or at least save everyone else from them.

To be honest, I’m starting to lose interest in saving stupidity from itself, and am leaning more in favor of rendering the stupid incapable of causing further harm.

One way of going about it is rendering those who receive public assistance in the form of programs like SNAP ineligible to vote for a few years after the last date in which they receive the assistance. But Democrats would get in the way, considering their obvious incentives to keep people on the public dole.

The “more free stuff for losers” vote is huge.

Best thing that can happen over the next few years is for the damage that Mamdani does to NYC is minimal, which is unlikely considering socialism’s extensive track record of causing immense casualties, before New Yorkers decide “we tried, let’s move on to something that actually works”.

But I’m not betting on it, because stupid people avoid learning their lessons with more passion than they avoid AIDS. And because I’ve worked in grocery and retail longer than what’s good for my mental health, I know that there’s a fuck-ton of stupidity out there.

Joshua Jahn: Remembered For Failure

Leave a reply

Today’s subject of ridicule is so inept, that I don’t even know where to begin. I hope that doesn’t mean that his ineptitude is contagious. Though if I’m experiencing the symptoms of my own ineptitude, there’s no need to panic, because caffeine usually helps with that. Also, I couldn’t fail as hard as the ass clown in question if I tried.

Who is he? The attempted “Anti ICE” sniper, Joshua Jahn.

Wow, he’s got the “sits in the back row playing on his MacBook” look down. A spokesman for the University of Texas stated that someone with his name and date of birth briefly attended a decade ago, so it seems he was a one-semester kid, which is consistent with the “the lights are on but nobody’s home” look on his dumb face.

So, what did he do? Notice how I called him the attempted “Anti ICE” sniper above? That wasn’t an accident, because he failed unbelievably fucking hard.

Because people like him try to make a name for themselves, I’m going to do what I have fun doing and take away his name, and replace it with a derisive nickname. The new name for his gravestone is Dim Shot.

Now, Dim Shot is not one of those snipers from your grand-daddy’s generation, he’s one of those new-fangled snipers who would write his entire manifesto on his shell casings if he had the space or the skill. But he didn’t, so he had to settle for writing “ANTI ICE” on just one of the shell casings, in all caps, and just wrote the rest down on notebook paper.

The gun that killed people was an 8mm bolt action rifle which Dim Shot purchased legally in August. The gun was taken into custody.

On Wednesday, September 24, 2025, Dim Shot positioned himself on a rooftop near an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office. As ICE agents were unloading detainees from a vehicle, Dim Shot opened fire upon the ICE agents.

Reportedly he had intended to maximize the damage to the ICE facility, and to its personnel. But just because he was trying, doesn’t mean he knew how. Dim Shot had completely missed ICE agents, and had instead hit detainees, killing one and injuring two.

You know, the very people he was attempting to fight for.

Dim Shot then fired off one last shot, and once again, he missed completely, unless the target was his own face. In which case, he finally managed to not completely fail at something.

Supposedly, Dim Shot did his research beforehand. Which I would have imagined would have involved cranking it to cartoon ponies between looking up ICE facility locations and their hours of operations, but it seems he downloaded a list of ICE facilities, and searched apps that tracked ICE agents, which have been promoted by leftists who deliberately endangered federal agents in so doing.

Also, he looked up video of the murder of Charlie Kirk. Apparently, he admired the handiwork of a furry-adjacent terrorist who got tired of beating off on his own, so he found a male in a dress to do it for him. The left has some shitty heroes.

You ready for the chilling words of a terrorist, straight from his manifesto? Actually, a shitty-ass note he left behind? Fear:

“Hopefully this will give ICE agents real terror, to think, ‘is there a sniper with AP rounds on that roof?”

Slow clap. The slowest fucking clap. Ain’t no clap slow enough, or sarcastic enough. Dim Shot was so effective at fucking over the people he set out to serve, he may as well have worked in government. At least he would have been paid to fail so hard.

In a stunning exhibition of the Dunning-Kruger effect, Dim Shot attributed his plan to his own genius mind:

“Yes, it was just me and my brain,”

And what a brain it was. I can just imagine scientists lining up to study what of it was left.

Now, ABC News wanted to pass on to us that Dim Shot liked playing video games, like anyone outside of the Amish community. Hey thanks ABC News, we care. Among the games that Dim Shot sucked at were Team Fortress 2, Left 4 Dead 2, and Rust. Not the same Rust where [joke redacted so Alec Baldwin doesn’t sue].

He also had a Reddit account, with which he expressed interest in smoking marijuana. And now we know where he got his strategic mind, and how his aim got so sharp.

In closing, he sucked.

People don’t seem to comprehend just how significant it is that the hippie generation is about to pass away.

Leave a reply

Yesterday, when commenting on the makeup of the No Kings protest, I pointed out how the vast majority of those in attendance are aging boomers who are just a few years away from not voting anymore.

Since then, I got to thinking about why people joined the hippies, and why people go furry or trans, and as one thought led to another, I began seeing connections, and they seemed to hold up well when considering matters in the broad strokes of recent history.

The recent shooter of Charlie Kirk didn’t surprise anyone when it turned out that he was a leftist. But what was surprising is that he came from a Mormon family, though he turned against his family’s viewpoints, turning hard towards the left. What’s more, he was at least adjacent to the furry community, and was in a homosexual relationship.

Traditional thinking goes that people who are raised in a religious household will maintain said household’s religious beliefs into their adulthood. But in many cases, such as the case of Bulge Rat (Tyler Robinson), they turn against the culture they were raised in.

If you were to study certain communities, such as the trans community and other left-wing communities, you may notice an unusual number of people who grew up in religious households. And, not only that, the households tended to be strict to the point of suffocating the child’s individuality.

For example, Jews can be heavily legalistic, to the point that some refuse to keep beef and cheese in the same refrigerator. The Mormons tend to be strict in their own way. They tend to stock up on non-perishible food, in case the end-time tribulation were to begin tomorrow. I’ve heard of kids who weren’t allowed to watch cartoons or play sports during the Sabbath.

When these kids become old enough to decide for themselves, they often tend towards communities that permit them to express their individualities, sometimes towards communities that are extremely liberal. And whats more, they tend to harbor extreme resentment for their respective families, and for the religions which they saw as stifling their childhoods.

Now, consider the boomer generation, which gave us hippies. Do you suppose that they came from a religious background? I think that’s natural to guess. The generation that preceeded them saw two world wars, and the development of atomic weapons. Considering this, the WW2 generation would have likely believed that the world was about to end. That’s understandable considering that those two world wars saw the deployment of the worst weapons that were available at the time, and shortly afterwards, nuclear weapon stockpiles grew to the point that all of humanity could be wiped out multiple times.

In the face of such annihilation, it’s natural to expect people to lean into their religions. But as parents became overly strict, there would come to be a backlash.

It should be understood that not everyone in a generational group lives up to the stereotypes associated with their respective groups. I see people eschew these stereotypes all the time. But it seems as though the boomer generational group has a disproportionate amount of people who have a distaste for religion, Christianity in particular. In light of this, it’s easy to see why the boomers gave us hippies, and a disproportionate amount of them are sexual libertines.

Their influence on society is difficult to understate. It’s largely due to them that children in the western world today tend to be viewed as an inconvenience rather than a treasure. What’s more, you’d have to search pretty hard to find western made entertainment media which portrays marriage and family in a positive light.

As a consequence of the choices of boomer era liberals, families were broken, communities became more dangerous, societies more dysfunctional, and nations on the verge of falling apart. But while this is obvious to just about everyone else, the liberal boomers obstinately refuse to admit that they were wrong, because they don’t want to go anywhere close to admitting that their religious parents were right.

But what they’re refusing to admit, subsequent generations are learning, resulting in a shift to the right. This shift will become more pronounced as the hippie generation passes away. That is guaranteed.

For those who need to know, parents without a religion tend to be far worse than those with one, by a considerable amount. Not only do they view their children as an inconvenience, there is no moral check on their narcissism, and they’ll only grudgingly show kindness towards their children, usually because they feel an obligation (birthdays, Christmas, etc.). And go ahead and pity the child in such a household when it’s time to punish them. In corporal punishment, the parents tend to go ape shit, and outside of that, their tendency to run their household like a dictator becomes more pronounced.

It’s in light of the left’s tendency to oppose Christianity that their simultaneous advocacy for homosexuality and Islam is easier to comprehend. When left to its own devices, Muslims will kill gays, because they view homosexuality as a sin that merits capital punishment. Obviously, the groups involved cannot be reconciled in the long term. However, each has at least a slight opposition to Christianity.

If it sounds like leftism is a huge anti-Christian club, that’s because it pretty much is. Remember that the term “left” as relates to political affiliation goes back to enlightenment era France, where those who were more traditional and more pro-Christian tended to sit on the right side of the house of representatives, while those who opposed them tended to seat themselves to the left. The political battle that we see today is part of a war that’s been going on for centuries.

As I see it, though, the war might finally be coming to an end, and it looks like conservatives are definitely going to win. Not only is a hugely left-wing generation on the verge of passing away, they’ve shown the obvious outcomes of their experimental ideas, and have left an example that inspires disgust.

And if the hippies are seen in a negative light today, they are definitely not going to be viewed favorably by future generations who will view the record of them with hindsight.