DJ Dimwits: Failing at a Gathering Near You

Leave a reply

If you’ve spent time in malls, cities, or college campuses, you’ve probably run into a DJ dimwit.

What is a DJ dimwit? It’s someone who plays music loudly from their phone as they walk about or do other things around other people. I chose the word “dimwit” to keep this post somewhat family-friendly, but you can probably think of a number of other pejorative adjectives that also start with the letter “D”.

People who listen to rap aren’t the only ones who do this, but they seem to be far more inclined to do it. Another thing I’ve noticed about people who listen to rap is that they seem to spend a lot more money on earbuds and earphones, but not use them (a lot of them complain that they’re broke, though).

There seems to be a positive correlation between how often you hear music from the phones of DJ dimwits and how bad the music is. To demonstrate this correlation, I’ve made a chart:

DJ Dimwit Graph

The trend appears to be that DJ dimwits actively avoid playing anything of quality from their phones. It’s hard to know what to make of this, aside from that they do this as part of a concerted effort to demoralize our society with substandard garbage. Unless their idea of singing is to either talk or bark to a beat.

On the rare occasion that you hear a DJ dimwit play a song that’s good (probably accidentally), they still upset people because they don’t want to hear that song played by a DJ dimwit.

For the most part, DJ dimwits are bad judges of what the rest of us want to hear. It’s kind of like how most streakers at sporting events are male, even though the typical viewer of sporting events are also male. Like the streaker, the DJ dimwit is making an assumption about whether the rest of us care for what they have to share.

A few things I learned while looking at computers

Leave a reply

I was curious as to what was on the market, so I decided to look around at new computers. It would probably be a short while before I purchase a new computer, but because I have a technology major, it probably wouldn’t hurt to be aware of what is out there.

While shopping around, both online and at retail locations like Walmart, there were a few things I learned that I found surprising.

For one thing, I was surprised to learn that the computer that I have now is not considered obsolete.

Yeah, that was a surprise. The laptop I use now was purchased around December 2009 to January 2010. It was a floor model of a discontinued laptop that I saw at Staples, and I got a discount on it. It has two 2.10GHz processors, 4 GB of RAM, and a 286 GB hard drive. I only spent a few hundred dollars on it.

What I find interesting is that, even though my laptop is over 5 years old, it’s comparable to what’s out there today (though perhaps on the lower end).

About a decade ago, tech was advancing so rapidly that what was purchased new was considered obsolete pretty fast, usually within a year-and-a-half of being purchased. It was actually kind of alarming. Many consumers were going out and purchasing newer computers, only to discard them about a couple years later and often because they took a few more seconds to boot up compared to when they were brand new.

In tech, one of the things to watch out for was “planned obsolescence”, which was a phrase that suggested that tech companies were aware that the products that they were making would one day be obsolete, even if they were, at the time of their manufacture, considered top-of-the-line. Some of the more cynical among us suspected that companies like Microsoft made their newer operating systems and updates to existing ones to consume more system resources in an attempt to encourage consumers to purchase more PCs. Whatever the cause, many computers fell down in the stampede of progress.

We’ve reached a point that tech companies have a much harder time doing more with the space available to them. At this point, it seems like they can only feasibly fit so many capacitors in such a small space, so the forward advancement in CPU processing power seems to have slowed.

So, what’s being used to encourage consumers to purchase more PCs? That leads to another thing that I discovered while shopping around. At one point, the processing power and storage of a computer were considered their main selling points. Today, it seems like tech companies are enticing consumers with features.

Some of these features are pretty cool, such as touch screens (though I don’t like smudges on my display screens), and detachable screens that would allow the displays to function as tablets (durability might be an issue).

One problem I’ve noticed with newer laptops is that some of them look really cheap. While features and technical specs are something to consider when shopping for a new computer, there is a certain form factor which is considered preferable. If I were to purchase a computer that’s cutting edge, I’d prefer for it to look slightly edge, rather than something with a Fisher Price look to it.

To make matters worse, Microsoft’s new operating system, Windows 8, isn’t very attractive. Their new home screen is particularly garish and overly simplistic, like something that a person could make in MS Paint in a few minutes. I’m not sure why Microsoft is so proud of it’s new home screen, but apparently they are, because it’s seen on many Windows 8 promos. A newer version of Windows 8 brings back the desktop, which is something that people seem to prefer. Microsoft has a tendency to attempt to fix things that aren’t broken, which is one problem, but do they have to phase out features that people like?

And speaking of phasing out features people like, I’ve noticed that some newer laptops are missing drives for optical media, such as CDs and DVDs. I understand that media is making the shift to digital downloads, but it seems to me that optical media is still relevant, so it would be too early to phase it out. People still have DVD collections today, and BluRay is still new.

And when it comes to missing features, netbooks are famous. Many people buy netbooks because they’re so cheap and many consumers suspect that they’d be getting the same experience with them as they would with a laptop. Me, I don’t take netbooks very seriously.

The laptop I have now might be on the lower end of what’s available, but for now, it seems to suffice with what I do with it. That may change in the near future, however. But it seems like I got a pretty good value with the laptop that I have now.

Stupid T-shirts, and what they say about the people that wear them

2 Replies

Each person has an image that they’re in charge of. Let’s look at a few T-shirts that demonstrate that they don’t know how to manage it.

math t shirt

Nothing says “herp derp” quite like a shirt which tells the world that you detest simple problem solving.

loud t shirt

In apartments, particularly ones in cities, among the most frequent complaints are noisy neighbors. When a person wears a shirt like this, what they are saying with it is that they make a lousy neighbor. The fact that the heart has a stoner face says the rest of what you need to know.

mirror t shirt

A person might find this shirt clever for a few moments, and that’s all the time that they’d need to purchase it on eBay. Afterwards, they’d probably figure out just how unclever it is to buy a T-shirt with a gag that’s incomplete without a mirror in close proximity. But not everyone.

t-shirt fbi

The words: “FBI: Female Body Inspector”. The message: “Please stop questioning my sexuality.” Interestingly, when I found this image, “unisex” was among the tags.

school shirt

Not everyone wants to work for Walmart. The ones that do may as well be the ones that aren’t motivated enough to become qualified to do something else. The message on this shirt is also available on hoodies, so one can nap face-down in class with added isolation or conceal the earbuds that they’re wearing while thinking the teacher doesn’t notice.

Why would anyone want to wear T-shirts like these? And if someone would make T-shirts like these, why wouldn’t they also make T-shirts that advertise that the wearer doesn’t wash his hands? It seems like there are plenty of people that would wear such a thing.

If you tell enough people that it’s possible to be the worst at something, you’ll see some of them race to the bottom. Perhaps it’s because they’re eager to stand out for anything, and they imagine that there’s less competition to be mediocre. However, if you see some of the T-shirts people are wearing, it becomes evident that this is not the case.

EDC: Stuff that I carry around

Leave a reply

EDC

Above is a picture of a few things that I carry about from day-to-day, just about every day. This isn’t necessarily everything I carry from day-to-day, and I might decide to stop carrying a certain item or start carrying something new. From the picture above, you might see that some of these items are worn. That’s because I really do carry them around a lot.

By number:

1. Comb
Sometimes wind can mess up the hair. Having a comb on your person is convenient for doing your hair back up again.

2. Carabiner
The carabiner pictured here is not considered load-bearing, which may be a reason to trade up for one that is. However, this one functions well for what it does: it’s easy to add keyrings to it or remove them, and can even hold some of the other items on this list.

3. USB flash drive
A very handy item in this digital age, it allows one to carry files about. If a friend finds a cool picture that you think would be a neat desktop background, you can copy it to a flash drive and take it home with you. Or you can use it to take work around with you, such as class assignments if you’re a college student.

Among the things I keep on my flash drive:

  • Music
  • A copy of my resume
  • A folder with pictures
  • Sermons in MP3 format
  • School assignments
  • Some freeware games, which can come in handy if I’m bored and my own computer is not around
  • Several books in PDF format
  • Some charts which can be handy for electronics technicians
  • PDF copies of booklets produced by my church
  • And other things

By the way, my flash drive is actually a Micro SD card adapter, so the content is actually stored on an SD card, which makes the combination compatible with more electronics, such as cell phones.

4. Mini roll of Gorilla Tape
Gorilla Tape is like duct tape, but with a much stronger adhesive. I folded a paper clip so it would have a loop, and I wrapped some Gorilla Tape onto it. This configuration makes it much easier to keep it on a keychain. The Gorilla Tape pictured is the white variety, which holds up better in sunlight.

I have used it before. A young girl’s slipper broke, so I used some of it to hold it together so she could keep wearing it that day. Her older sister happens to be a woman I’m fond of, so it was nice to have the Gorilla Tape on me for that opportunity.

5. LED flashlight
Some businesses offer this kind of flashlight as a freebie, which is really nice considering how useful these things are. I’ve used this in dark places and while it was dark outside. It’s a handy item.

6. Chap Stick
Survivalists might have some uses for lip balm, but I find that this is nice to use for it’s intended purpose: to prevent dry, cracked, or sunburned or wind-burned lips.

7. Mechanical pencil, G2 gel pen, and blank cards folded in half
The mechanical pencil is a Pentel Twist-E Click, which is currently my favorite mechanical pencil. Most mechanical pencils have a small, stubby eraser that wears down quickly. The Pentel Twist-E Click has an adjustable eraser that lasts a while. The G2 gel pen looks like a red pen, but I added black ink to it. The idea was to discourage pen theft, as most people prefer black or blue pens to red ones. As for the blank cards, I find them handy for writing down things like reminders and schedules. I carried a pocket notebook around before, but the cards take up less space, and reminders written on them are more apparent.

Not pictured:
Leatherman Squirt
A nice multitool that can also fit nicely on the carabiner. However, it has a knife on it, so I decided not to take it with me to school.

Cell phone
Right now, I have an inexpensive pay-as-you-go phone. I primarily use it to make calls and send messages. It has a tendency to accidentally dial people while it’s in my pocket, and I’ve lost a lot of minutes because of this already. I often keep this phone in my dorm. However, I also have a Blackberry Torch that is not connected to a wireless network, which I sometimes use to listen to music.

Those are some of the things that I carry about day-to-day. Feel free to make suggestions in the comments section. If you’d like to share what you carry around from day-to-day, you can share in the comments, either by listing them off there or linking to your own list.

Butter in Coffee: Bulletproof or Not?

Leave a reply

I’ve heard about this thing in which people were putting butter in their coffee. The idea comes off as some sort of life hack that, when done, allows a person to lose weight and live healthier. Supposedly, a person who does this gets more out of their coffee by feeling alert longer and feeling fuller and more energized. Some even say that they can pretty much skip breakfast by drinking this so-called “bulletproof coffee”.

It sounded interesting, so I decided to give it a bit of a try to see whether the claims are true. I was a bit skeptical. Wouldn’t that be a little fattening? Wouldn’t such a thing be of little nutritional value?

The results? I’m not sure whether it’s connected, but for the time that I’ve been trying it, I haven’t been feeling very good. Actually, I’ve felt bloated and somewhat sluggish while trying it (which, for me, might be a little hard to imagine).

As it turns out, I was doing it wrong. To truly drink “bulletproof coffee”, I had to use grass-fed butter. Also, the coffee had to be a certain variety. Specifically, the same kind of coffee sold by the company that primarily encourages the fad of adding butter to coffee.

I don’t mean to say that a person can’t lose weight by having only buttered coffee for breakfast. If that buttered coffee is a replacement for bacon and eggs, it’s possible that such a diet could result in weight loss. However, that might have more to do with a person eating less of what they were eating before than a supposed benefit of an alleged miracle diet.

Could it be that many people have been had? If so, it wouldn’t be the first time.

Decades ago, the Beechnut corporation had large quantities of pork belly. Pork belly was viewed as discards, but it was also the usual ingredient for bacon. Beechnut hired Edward Bernays, the man credited as the father of public relations, to market bacon to an American people who, while it may be hard to believe today, largely didn’t want it. Bernays was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, so he knew a few things about how people think, including that people tended to put a lot of trust in professionals. The usual breakfast at the time was a slice of bread and a cup of coffee before rushing out the door to work in an increasingly industrialized America. Bernays sought out doctors in an effort to find some that would agree with him that Americans would benefit from a heavier breakfast. He would then use this as the basis for his push to market bacon. How successful were his efforts? America seems to be much heavier for it. Bacon, which is usually mostly pork fat, appears in many food items and many consider bacon and eggs to be breakfast staples. Many even came to think of breakfast as being the most important meal of the day. Beechnut made off well, as they found that an effective way to dispose of pork belly is straight down the throats of millions of impressionable people, and they even convinced them to pay them for it!

Fast-forward to today: Dave Asprey, CEO of Bulletproof Coffee, wants you to believe that he “learned about the power of butter at 18,000 feet of elevation near Mt. Kailash in Tibet”. His corporate logo appears to be a man in meditation with a round symbol on his chest that might bear resemblance to some kind of far-east mystical symbol, which may be an indication of the kind of people that he’s looking to take advantage of.

May I have my coffee without the implied mysticism?

May I have my coffee without the implied mysticism?

In the article linked to above, Asprey cites a fictional character when making his point that cheap coffee steals a person’s mental edge and “makes you weak”. He links to the Wikipedia article for that fictional character, but he doesn’t provide scientific or scholarly citations to back up his claim. What he does link to is his online store.

Incidentally, as I was looking at his online store, I found this warning:

California Proposition 65 WARNING: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, or birth defects or other reproductive harm.

This may sound a little picky, but I prefer to drink coffee without being concerned about whether it damages my parts.

I went back to normal coffee, without the butter. And it tasted far superior. Still, I think that, like many fads, this fad of putting butter in coffee might last a while, even though it seems pretty weird to see someone do. Kind of like wearing one’s pants under their buttocks so their boxers are showing. From what I can tell, that was a trend that started about two decades ago, and people have since then found out how ridiculous it looks (but not quickly enough), but there are still a few people who do it anyway. Maybe if there were more occurrences of wedgies, they’d stop doing that.

How to Fail at Making Pizza

Leave a reply

cheap pizza

To make food for someone else is like an expression of love. However, some people try really hard and fail. Others fail without the effort. This post offers advice on how to fail at making pizza.

It’s hard to imagine that anyone needs the advice in this post, but a lot of people put it into practice, anyway.

Step one: Go cheap.
If you’re trying to make the worst pizza, you can do as NASA does and purchase the cheapest product of what’s available. You may have to poke around at the freezer section quite a bit to find the cheapest pizza, considering that the cheapest pizza package may not be the cheapest pizza per pound. To go really cheap, go for the cheapest pizza per pound. Some supermarket chains display the price per pound. The cheapest pizza per pound tends to be made from less quality ingredients, and more can possibly go wrong while baking.

Step two: Go cheese.
It seems to me that the most popular variety of frozen pizza is cheese pizza. I think that this is because cheese pizza is like a blank canvas, whereon one can put whatever ingredients they please. To make the least of your cheese pizza, just put it into the oven as it is. To take this further, go for the cheese pizzas that, for whatever reason, don’t even have tomato sauce. I’m not sure why I’m seeing more cheese pizzas without tomato sauce. Does anyone enjoy it that way?

Step three: Or pepperoni.
The only way to make a pizza duller than a cheese pizza is to instead go with a pepperoni pizza. I don’t know how pepperoni got to be so popular as a pizza topping. What I do know is that what we call “pepperoni” in America is not actually pepperoni. The word “pepperoni” is Italian for “peppers”. Pepperoni is the most cliche, stereotypical, boring pizza topping. I actually prefer cheese pizzas to pepperoni pizzas.

Step four: Burn the cheese.
You’ll know you’ve left the pizza in the oven for too long when the cheese is dark brown. To make a real failure of a pizza, overbake it so the cheese is the hardest part to bite through, so that when someone attempts to take a bite out of a slice of pizza, they end up taking the rest of the cheese from the slice with it, possibly getting tomato sauce on their chin. This wouldn’t happen if the tomato sauce were omitted, however, so there’s a bit of a trade-off there.

Step five: Only slice the cheese.
Once the pizza is out of the oven, take the pizza cutter across the surface of the cheese. It’s permissible if the pizza cutter does make it through the dough, as long as the pizza maintains it’s overall integrity. But do cut the outer crust. The idea is to make it appear as though the pizza has been cut, so that when someone tries to take a slice of pizza with the expectation that the slice will come free, the person ends up having to slice through the pizza with a spatula to finish the job you started. Truly bad pizza isn’t just sub-par, it’s spiteful.

Step six: Set on middle of table to serve, then sit in the other room to watch soap operas.
At this point, you probably won’t be interested in partaking of your own handiwork. There are still many cafeterias you’d be well qualified for, however.

While we’re on the topic of pizza, here is a list of pizza toppings I like:

  • Hamburger – I consider this the best pizza meat topping.
  • Pineapple – This may sound strange, but it’s actually tasty.
  • Jalapeno peppers – Or habaneros.
  • Mushrooms
  • Onions – Fresh is preferred over frozen. Onions that were previously frozen are usually soggy and gross.

Have you had a bad pizza before? Please share in the comments section.

More pros than cons to providing citations and staying on topic

1 Reply

I’ve decided to provide a critical analysis of a student essay by the name of “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” authored by Marjorie Lee Garretson, and published in the student newspaper of the University of Mississippi in April 2010. Those who wish to read the essay may do so here.

In her essay, Marjorie makes the case for a vegetarian lifestyle by stating that there are health benefits to adopting it. She also makes a moral appeal, citing the treatment of livestock used as food sources. At some points in her essay, Marjorie makes some statements that are quite emotionally charged.

The title of her article, “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life”, is somewhat misleading, as it would lead the reader to expect an enumeration of both pros and cons to a vegetarian lifestyle. Instead, Marjorie makes a one-sided case for vegetarianism that leaves little doubt as to her position. What’s more, the title leads one to believe that the focus of the article would be the benefits of a vegetarian lifestyle, when in fact much of the article consists of moral appeals, such as criticizing the treatment of livestock used as food sources, even though the treatment of livestock has no direct impact on the lifestyle of a person who is either vegetarian or prefers a conventional diet.

Persons who argue for a vegetarian lifestyle typically begin on a rational-sounding note, though much of the time, their arguments quickly degrade into emotional appeals and ad-hominem attacks against anyone who would dissent. Marjorie, however, wastes little time getting to accusing adherents of the conventional diet of overlooking or ignoring for convenience the multiple benefits that she claims the vegetarian lifestyle provides.

Of course, she was only getting started. She lists the supposed benefits of a vegetarian lifestyle, which she says includes:

  • lower body mass index
  • significantly decreased cancer rate
  • longer life expectancy
  • avoiding Alzheimer’s disease
  • avoiding osteoporosis

There is a problem, however. She provides no citations. Marjorie’s claims are not considered common knowledge. They challenge conventional thinking. As such, citations are important in backing up her claims. Without citations, she is allowing her audience to assume that these claims are conclusions reached as a result of years of study by educated professionals, and it would seem as though she expects that her claims will be accepted by her audience without inquiry.

This is a trend that continues in Marjorie’s writing. She goes on to claim that “It takes less energy and waste to produce vegetables and grains than the energy required to produce meat.” Do you see where this is headed? She goes on to cite the statistic that it takes 16 pounds of grain and 5000 gallons of water to produce a pound of meat. This statistic is among the most repeated among those advocating a vegetarian lifestyle. However, the statistic is false. She provides no citations, however, so she is apparently banking on her audience not being particularly inquisitive, and accepting her claims on the basis of “sounds like it’s probably true.”

However, just because something sounds eye-opening doesn’t mean it’s true. A study by the Council of Agricultural Science and Technology in 1999 has found that 2.6 pounds of grain is used to produce a pound of beef in developed countries, while in developing countries the number is 0.3 lbs (for anyone wondering, this is what a citation looks like).

Vegetarians claim that the land that is used to raise cattle and other livestock could be more productive if that same land would be used to produce vegetables and grain. However, not every plot of land is suitable for growing grain. Livestock is typically raised on marginal lands that are not suitable for growing vegetables.

Marjorie goes on to claim that the runoff of fecal matter from meat factories is the single most detrimental pollutant to our water supply. She provides as her only citation in the entire article the Environmental Protection Agency, even if she doesn’t mention a specific study, leaving her readers with the task of verification. Perhaps Marjorie was employing some psychology, intentional or not; people tend toward the path of least resistance, so they’re likely to accept her claim rather than do their own research (such as with a simple web search) to verify.

The most significant source of pollutants according to the United States Department of Agriculture is nonpoint sources. Agricultural pollutants are among the pollutants that fall under this category. However, the EPA lists among these pollutants “Excess fertilizers, herbicides and insecticides from agricultural lands and residential areas”. So, ironically, Marjorie’s only citation in her one-sided case for vegetarianism is for a study that states that runoff from growing vegetables is among the most significant pollutants for water. Other sources of nonpoint pollution include urban runoff, salt from irrigation practices, and other sources.

The following charts show the ratio of pollutants in water supplies. Interestingly, as much as industry is demonized for being a significant polluter, it comes nowhere close to non-point pollutants, to which agriculture contributes heavily:

Percentages_sources_of_pollution_that_impair_water_bodies

Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Public Domain

Marjorie goes on to cite inhumane treatment of livestock. While there may be a problem with the treatment of livestock, vegetarians seem to idealize life in the wilderness. Anyone who thinks that life in the wilderness is idyllic has not spent a significant amount of time outdoors. Most people don’t have to. It’s typically done for a refreshing change of pace or to enjoy scenery.

For animals, however, it’s a different story. Animals live there. And for them, it’s a constant battle for survival. Nearly every organism in the wild is surrounded by predators and scavengers, many of which would happily accept them as their next food source, and not care about their objections or opinions on the matter. When animals do die, it’s usually a painful death as a result of predation.

Humans give livestock a pretty sweet deal. Livestock get to live with no fear of predation. They get enough to eat, whether it’s enough to sustain them or plenty to prevent them from getting too lean. When the time comes to make them into our food, we make things much quicker than predatory animals do.

Marjorie also voices objection to the practice of using livestock to obtain dairy products such as milk and eggs. She likens the practice to that of puppy mills, and accuses adherents of the conventional diet of looking the other way when it comes to livestock.

Again, the title of Marjorie’s work is “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life”, which leads the reader into believing that the potential cons of the decision to go vegetarian would be considered. However, Marjorie doesn’t list any. It shouldn’t be a surprise by now that Marjorie was not interested in providing an objective analysis of the options. It should be easy to guess what her position is.

If Marjorie were to touch upon the cons of living a meat-free lifestyle, she’d have a fair amount to discuss. For example, those who are strictly vegan have no sources of iodine or essential B vitamins, a deficiency of which can lead to mental retardation and irreversible neurological damage. However, that’s a potential for discussion that she ignored.

Due to the deficit of citations and the overall level of professionalism in this piece, I do not believe that Marjorie’s essay is University-level work. The University of Mississippi should have felt at least a little hesitant in posting it on their web space as representative of their student’s work, and if this work is reprinted in any textbook (as it is in mine), students would be right to critically analyze it to identify Marjorie’s mistakes, and avoid making the same ones themselves.

Works Cited:

“CAST Animal Agriculture and Global Food Supply.” Publications. CAST, 1 Jan. 1999. Web. 22 Jan. 2015. <http://www.cast-science.org/publications/?animal_agriculture_and_global_food_supply&show=product&productID=2836&gt;.

“What Is Nonpoint Source Pollution?” What Is Nonpoint Source Pollution? EPA. Web. 22 Jan. 2015. <http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/whatis.cfm&gt;.

Greninja is Uber, says Smogon

5 Replies

Smogon has just banned Greninja.

Yes, Greninja has just been banned from Smogon’s OU tier on PokemonShowdown.com. If a person wants to use Greninja on their team in Smogon’s competitive environment on PokemonShowdown.com, they would have to do so on the Uber tier (or on Anything Goes).

Personally, I like Greninja, so it’s a little sad to see him removed from a tier. However, I understand the reasoning behind the ban. There are a lot of other Greninja fans out there, though, and not all of them are likely to take this news very well.

It should be understood that Smogon doesn’t make it’s rules to enforce on the general community of competitive Pokemon players. Smogon only makes it’s rules for use by those playing in Smogon’s competitive community. So if you have a pokemon battle with someone in a parking lot somewhere and they insist on you not using Greninja because Smogon banned it, you can point out that you’re not on PokemonShowdown.com.

Having said that, Smogon does see the occasional newbie who joins their message boards and insists on unbanning every pokemon that they like and changing what Smogon does. That person isn’t likely to get very far, and in most cases, such people don’t understand why Smogon does what it does. Smogon mainly focuses on providing a balanced competitive environment, and this works better when pokemon that are too overcentralizing are restricted from use. Greninja was an excellent example of an overcentralizing pokemon that was unhealthy for the OU tier.

Greninja was a pretty good pokemon in X and Y, but when ORAS came out, Greninja got some additional moves to answer the pokemon that checked it before. Low Kick was a physical Fighting move that works well on Chansey and Porygon2 (the latter of which was mainly played in OU as a check to Greninja). It also got Gunk Shot, which gave it a strong solution to Fairy types like Clefable. Greninja was quickly running out of counters. With it’s excellent speed and special attack, combined with an ability that gives it STAB on every attack move it uses and makes it a snap to fit on just about any team, Greninja was becoming a pokemon to prepare for when team building, sometimes by including more than one pokemon for the purposes of countering it. And sometimes by adding it’s own Greninja.

Those against the ban pointed out Greninja’s frailty, saying that it could be easily revenge killed. That may be true, but to revenge kill something first requires that a pokemon be KOed. Then the revenge killer can come in and get revenge. That’s why it’s called “revenge killing”. But here’s the thing: the Greninja player can just switch out. This simple move can bring a defensive pivot into play which could handle the revenge killer, and allow Greninja to strike again at a later time. Greninja might be frail, but that only matters when Greninja takes hits. Greninja is very fast and has a high special attack. If Greninja can KO an opponent before it makes a move, then it’s low defensive stats aren’t going to make a difference. This is why some players can confidently give Greninja a Life Orb to hold. The item gives Greninja a boost to it’s damage output, and the recoil damage for it’s use is a very good trade-off.

There are bound to be people out there that resent Smogon for the decisions that they make. Their solution to that problem is to battle in a different competitive environment. Again, Smogon’s rules are intended only for the Smogon competitive community. If players don’t like what Smogon does, they have the choice of battling in different communities. Back when Garchomp was banned in generation four, some players answered by doing just that. It would seem that they wanted to use Garchomp really badly, so they found some competitive communities that allowed it, and probably spent plenty of time battling in environments where Garchomp appeared on nearly every team.

Will something like that happen now that Greninja has been banned? Maybe. But there are bound to be some fans that will be disappointed by the decision, as there are plenty of people out there that really like Greninja. Perhaps one of the reasons that Greninja has so many fans is because it could win lots of battles. Of course, that it’s a ninja probably has something to do with it.

Smogon is no stranger to seeing some upset critics. However, a lot of these critics don’t understand competitive play very well. If you’re going to have critics, you’re probably going to prefer that those critics don’t know what they’re talking about, because that’s a sign that you’re probably right about something.

Still, it might be interesting to see how the OU metagame shapes up because of this. It stands to reason that some more obscure pokemon that were mainly placed in teams to deal with Greninja will see less use. That means that we’ll likely see less of Empoleon and Porygon2. Landorus-T is also likely to decline in use. During suspect testing for Greninja, Heatran replaced Landorus-T for the #1 spot in PokemonShowdown’s OU usage stats, and the margin has been widening. Heatran isn’t likely to be banned, however, because it’s not as overcentralizing as Greninja, and is likely only as popular as it is due to a lack of pokemon that can do what it does.

The dust has settled from the latest suspect testing, and it’s been revealed that Greninja has been banned. Some are likely to be really surprised by this, unless they’ve been reading some of the arguments made for and against the banning. As much as I like Greninja, the arguments supporting the ban sounded to me like they were very well made. Some are likely to disagree, however, and the likely result is some seriously heated nerd battles for some time to come.

If one really likes Greninja and they want to see this matter in a more positive light, they can look at this as a promotion for Greninja: Smogon has promoted Greninja to the status of Uber pokemon because it’s a very strong pokemon. That might not work for everyone, though. Still, if a player doesn’t want to play by Smogon’s rules, they can just find a different competitive environment out there. And if they really want to, they can go to some message board on GameFaqs and write a rant about it there. It might be that they’ll get into an argument that they can’t win, but that might be safer than posting the same rant on Smogon’s message boards, where the poster would lose the argument much quicker.

So yeah, Greninja is banned. What do you think? Me, I’m a little disappointed. But in battles with my friends, I can still use my Greninja to Gunk Shot their Clefables. A person could still use Greninja in VGC, the official format of the Video Game Championships, which is likely to be dominated by Mega Salamence. That would be the pokemon that Smogon banned from OU without a suspect test or vote, and it would seem that just about no one questioned them about it. Sometimes, a pokemon is way too strong for it’s environment. As for Greninja, it certainly had an impact. It’s currently ranked #8 in PokemonOnline’s ORAS Uber tier. That’s pretty phenomenal for something that’s neither a legendary or a mega pokemon. Of course, it’s possible that it’s being used by fans that just want to use it.

I know that some of you might be quite upset about this, but please keep it civil in the comments section.

Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire: My impressions

Leave a reply

Over the last several weeks, I’ve played some Pokemon Alpha Sapphire, one of the two newest installments of the Pokemon series. If you’re a Pokemon fan, you might already have at least one of these two games, so you probably don’t need a review to tell you that you’d like this game. Actually, this is less like a review and more like my own impression of Pokemon Alpha Sapphire, the one that I’ve played.

So, you might be thinking of asking, “Is this the kind of game that anyone would like, even someone like Adolf Hitler?” Let me tell you something about Adolf Hitler: Adolf Hitler was a Nazi. In fact, he was the biggest Nazi of them all.

just say no

There are bound to be people out there that don’t like Pokemon ORAS (short for Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire, which is like a tongue twister to say). However, I think it’s a pretty well-made product.

Yes, ORAS is a remake of Ruby and Sapphire, and while there’s a real element of nostalgia to it, so much was added to the experience that it could hardly be called the same experience as the originals.

For one thing, the presentation is very similar to that of Pokemon X and Y, which I don’t recall meeting very many complaints. The overworld map generally has an overhead perspective, as do caves and buildings, with some exceptions. Generally, this aspect of the presentation has improvements over X and Y, which seems natural, considering GameFreak has had more experience with dynamic perspective since it was first implemented in X and Y. Like X and Y, it’s the presentation in the battles that really shines. Each of the pokemon models are well rendered and animated, with a cel-shading effect that makes the battles look almost like the Pokemon anime. GameFreak did very well with this in X and Y, and that they took the same approach in ORAS is a decision that seems pretty sound.

Perhaps the biggest issue for Pokemon ORAS is the balance of gameplay, though this issue wasn’t nearly as severe was it was in Pokemon X and Y (where it took a long time to get the third badge, and after you did, you could get a mega pokemon, and the badges generally came in rapid succession). Much of the lack of balance with X and Y came from the fact that once a player could use mega evolutions, they could sweep most of the rest of the game with ease. In ORAS, there is a little more balance with mega evolution, but the way it was introduced was pretty odd. About midway through, the player receives a legendary pokemon that wasn’t available until the post-game in the originals, and it could mega evolve. The player doesn’t have to battle it, either. It’s not broken like either of the Mega Charizards, but it’s still a very strong pokemon.

Like the originals, though, once you capture Kyogre or Groudon, you’re set until the post-game. Pokemon ORAS takes this further, though, by allowing the player to access their newer, stronger “Primal Reversion” forms, which allow what was already a couple really strong pokemon to hammer most of what the game can throw at them.

For the most part, though, if you’ve played Pokemon before, you already have a good idea of what to expect from ORAS, but that doesn’t mean that it doesn’t deliver an excellent experience. In fact, there are many standout aspects of ORAS compared to the originals. For one thing, there’s much more character development. It’s a little surprising, but it would seem that the main character you don’t choose (from between Brendan and May) becomes a somewhat romantic interest as the game progresses, in a manner similar to Shauna from X and Y. Characters such as Matt and Tabitha are far more interesting and well-defined (rather than being the generic Admins they were before), and Archie actually turns out to be quite an interesting character. The character of Wally is also much further explored (and he gets a pretty sweet battle tune).

Many Pokemon players consider the real meat of the game to be the post-game, when new areas become accessible, and the flow of the game is not limited by a plot. In ORAS, there is a bit of an extension which occurs after the initial victory over the champion in the form of the Delta Episode. The Delta Episode is an additional scenario which adds more to the story of the Hoenn region, mega pokemon, and Rayquaza. A lot can be said about the Delta Episode, and among those things is that there is a lot of dialogue! But there is also a lot of character development, particularly for Steven.

Pokemon ORAS is a game which seems like it was made with the fans in mind. One could imagine the following exchange having taken place between GameFreak and a Pokemon fan:

Fan: Wouldn’t it be cool if we could fly on a pokemon around a 3D map of Hoenn?
GF: I agree. Let’s call that “soaring” and put it in ORAS.
Fan: I think it would also be cool if it were easier to get a pokemon with high IVs, such as through chaining or something like that.
GF: I agree.
Fan: Wouldn’t it also be cool if hatching eggs became easier because there was a long path to ride a bike on?
GF: Why don’t we make a circular path that can be traversed by only holding down one direction on the plus control pad?
Fan: I think that it would be sweet if Rayquaza got a mega form that didn’t need a mega stone, and was much stronger than it had to be.
GF: Okay. It’ll be interesting to see what competitive communities such as Smogon do about it.
Fan: And a bunch more mega evos would be nice.
GF: Agreed.
Fan: And it would be cool if one of the event pokemon became obtainable in-game.
GF: Why don’t you play ORAS and find out which one?

Yeah, there are new mega evos, which has had a real impact on the competitive scene. Also impacting the competitive scene is a new set of move tutors. Some pokemon seriously benefit from this, such as Greninja, which gets low kick to answer Chansey, and Gunk Shot. Another nice touch is that obtaining pokemon through Dexnav allows the player to encounter pokemon that know egg moves. There are also a lot of legendary pokemon to obtain in this game. For competitive players, there’s a lot to like in ORAS. But if a person plays competitively, they’d probably want a copy of Omega Ruby or Alpha Sapphire, because at least until next year they are considered to be the definitive Pokemon games.

It’s obvious that a lot of effort went into Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire, and the result is that they turned out excellently.

10 out of 10