But what Biden himself didn’t count on is that a bunch of nerds had developed an algorithm that tracked the behavior of voting software used in swing states, and these nerds would watch in real time as hundreds of thousands of votes were flipped to favor Joe Biden, or were altogether dropped.
The following image shows an example of the code that showed a flip in action:
This is one example of many instances of code showing how votes were flipped.
What the code shows us is that if the election were conducted without cheating, Donald Trump would have 307 electoral votes, securing him a second term by a considerable margin.
Biden has already declared himself President-Elect, and numerous media outlets have presumptuously declared him the same, even though he was not yet certified, and Trump has already filed lawsuits challenging the results.
Legacy media is squeamish about reporting on these stories, because they had a horse in the race, and therefore cannot be counted on to speak objectively. Their pretext is that they don’t want to cover stories that would “undermine faith in the integrity of the election process”, unlike their obsessive years-long propagation of the Russian collusion conspiracy theory, which turned out to be an absolute hoax.
You know what else would undermine faith in the integrity of the electoral process? Cheating.
If corporate media isn’t going to cover the real story when it happens, but instead tell fairy tales, then people will figure out how useless they are, with the smarter among us being the first to do so.
This is our chance to be prepared for it. Here’s some recommended actions:
Stock up on shelf-stable food items,
Secure your home, preferably 2A style,
Procure various sundry items, it’s difficult to tell what there may be a shortage of,
Make sure bills are paid, and some money is saved, if this can be reasonably done.
Be prepared to hit the road on a moment’s notice. Consider assembling a bug-out bag.
You might ask, “What if the lockdown doesn’t happen?” Generally, it’s better to have and not need than to need and not have. People should be prepared for disasters, in any case.
But consider this: we’ve already seen lockdowns, and no one asked us whether we thought they were a good idea. What’s more, much of Europe has already enacted a second round of lockdowns, with little notice, leading to rioting in Italy and France.
Some of you might think Trump might help you. His ability to do so might be limited, especially if your state has a Democrat as a governor. Besides, they didn’t try cheating him out of an election because they wanted him to have a chance, and they’re not censoring him and his followers on social media and corporate news outlets because they want him to do anything about it.
The left has previously stated their intention to listen to the advice of the World Health Organization (WHO). Since then, the WHO has voiced their opposition to lockdowns, saying that they should only be used as a last resort. The left isn’t listening, because their own control over us is more important to them than anything doctors have to say about it, and “science” is only useful to them as far as they can use it to their own ends.
You might feel secure because your job was on the arbitrary list compiled by your state governor that he deemed “life-sustaining”. But be warned, Biden’s list may be different from that of your state governor.
The initial lockdowns exasperated the problems of poverty and child starvation. It is advised that you act for your family’s benefit, as the left has proven that they don’t care about you or your children.
There it a lot more to say about how to prep for another lockdown, so it’s suggested that you check out some guides on how to do so, such as this one by Preparedness.news.
This is our opportunity to prepare, and it may slip away from us more quickly than we realize.
Logo from Maddox’s website, The Best Page in the Universe
In the mid-2000’s, I found a humor site called The Best Page in the Universe, written by a man with the pen-name Maddox. The site was filled with pages of caustic satire, written in the tone of an irate college student.
What I found was so hilarious that I decided to read through the archives, and checked back frequently for updates, which at the time were weekly.
The Best Page in the Universe had spawned many imitators, and it’s plain to see why: the site’s popularity had shown that it was possible for an ordinary guy to share his opinion on the internet, and gain a bigger following than Pepsi.
Maddox grew his own popularity by making fun of mimes, vegans, and feminists, ridiculing hate mail that he received, and criticizing children’s artwork. He satisfied a desire for web satire in a way few other sites could. What’s more, Maddox made a point of not running ads on his site. Because of this, he was mainly dependent on donations and his online store to gain income from the site.
Over time, updates on the site began to slow. There were a couple reasons for this. For one thing, Maddox began to emphasize quality over quantity for his site. Updates became more infrequent, but were usually longer reads. While this may have been the kind of content Maddox wanted to produce, it was a step away from the kind of content that initially facilitated his popularity. What’s more, the infrequency of his updates resulted in a gradual dropoff in visits.
As most online content creators can tell you, the key to maintaining a following is to adopt a consistent update schedule.
Another reason for the slowing of content on his page was because Maddox was writing his first book, The Alphabet of Manliness. This book, released in June of 2006, allowed Maddox to more directly profit off his writings.
While many webpage authors would have simply printed their web writings, Maddox’s book was packed with new content. It was received so well, that it reached number 2 on the New York Times Best Seller list.
But as for the website, things were slowing down. After a while, we found out that it was due to another project: The Best Show in the Universe. Maddox is getting his own TV show? Not quite, it’s a series of shorts on YouTube. The tone was similar to his website, but in the form of spoken rants with accompanying visuals. It was as funny as you might expect, but overall, a simple affair considering the patience that was required of Maddox’s fans.
But it seemed like Maddox was getting into a consistent schedule, with the Best Show in the Universe having periodic updates… for a while. After just a few installments, updates became scarce to the point that one would legitimately wonder whether Maddox was abandoning the project, or wasn’t really serious about it at all.
Maddox eventually wrote two more books, one continuing his popular joke of criticizing children’s artwork, and the other filled with short essays reminiscent of his older pages.
In addition to this, Maddox got accounts on Facebook and Twitter, and he also uploads podcasts to YouTube. While social media is excellent for promoting your content, it seems like social media has become the main place to keep up with Maddox, as he seldom posts to his old website. The original rebel of the internet has become increasingly dependent on mainstream platforms, and people are hardly noticing him anymore.
Nowadays, if you don’t like the update that Maddox posted to his website this year, maybe he’ll make another next year.
A retrospective of Maddox hardly seems complete without bringing up the “LOLsuit”, a bit of drama where Maddox sued Dick Masterson after they ended a podcast called, The Biggest Problem in the Universe. The suit seemed to have been brought about because of hurt feelings, but Maddox eventually dropped the suit. Interestingly, Masterson benefitted greatly from the publicity. But as for Maddox, not so much.
Since his site became popular, Maddox moved from Utah to California. While the move likely provided Maddox with a more vibrant environment compared to his old Utah life, it seems as though California culture has had an influence on him, as evidenced by his more recent political ramblings.
At this point, the finest service we can render to Maddox is to remember him for the badass he once was, rather than what he had eventually become.
As he is now, Maddox is an interesting case study in how a person can become outrageously popular, but have little apparent idea what made him popular, then proceed to squander his publicity. Having said that, there’s no denying his presence in the early days of the internet, and his influence which led to many imitators.
The idea that one guy can become as influential as Maddox was just by posting random ramblings is inspiring in its own way.
Legacy media is a regular fountainhead of misinformation. So imagine my shock when they interrupt the President of the United States to accuse him of misinformation, and then proceed to fact-check the alleged misinformation.
The following video is an example of one media outlet, MSNBS MSNBC, doing just that:
This video was posted back on the 5th, but seeing as I’m one of the growing number of Americans that distrust corporate televised news media, I didn’t become aware of it until days later.
Ideally, when corporate media does its job, it fact-checks a speaker after he’s finished speaking, not before. However, MSNBC apparently decided to defenestrate this notion, joining it to the desiccated corpse of their journalistic integrity thrown about the landscape of their corporate offices.
That, coupled with the undisguised disdain from the host, indicates that there’s something about what President Trump said that got under their skin.
Considering that legacy media spent years stuck on a Russian collusion conspiracy theory which alleged that Russians tampered with the 2016 Presidential election, which turned out to be completely false and had no supporting evidence, it’s interesting that they have anything to say about what they consider misinformation coming from President Trump, and they didn’t even wait for him to finish speaking.
Corporate televised news misses the days when they held the monopoly on information. But then the internet happened, and people were no longer like hamsters going to the same feeder. Nowadays, televised news mainly preys on vulnerable adults.
If anything, the corporate news media should be cheering Trump for reelection. This is because much of their material for the past few years has been over him, and if Trump is no longer in the White House, they’d have to start doing some real journalism. And no, that doesn’t mean commenting on what’s trending on Twitter. If anyone cared what was happening on Twitter, they’d check out Twitter.
Because legacy media thinks it’s cool to interrupt the President when he’s speaking, they shouldn’t have a problem with us interrupting them by listening to Joe Rogan or Tim Pool, instead.
Ah, the shenanigans that occur when the corporate media is allowed to call elections.
Who remembers the following classic?
L. O. effing L.
Going further back, there’s this gem:
Some states are still counting votes, recounts are expected in at least two states, and there may even be lawsuits coming. Considering this, it might be interesting to see what develops in the coming days, and what of it passes through the filter of legacy media.
Christian Weston Chandler, outspoken critic of Donald Trump
The Associated Press has just called the Presidential election for Joe Biden. While legal challenges are now underway, it appears as though it may be Biden’s victory. The cheap seats are cheering and high-fiving each other. However, seasoned Democrats don’t seem so cheerful.
One needs only see what’s happening in the Senate, House, and Governor’s races to see why. Depending on how a Georgia runoff election goes on January 5, Republicans may end up with one more seat in the Senate, securing their existing majority. Republicans have so far gained 8 House seats, while Democrats have only gained 3. Of the 11 elections for state governor, 8 of the winners were Republican, with Republicans gaining a state, which a Democrat lost.
While Democrats envisioned an undeniable slam-dunk victory, the opposite happened, with Republicans making gains. This puts a bit of a shadow over the post-Trump celebrations, as does Trump’s judicial legacy of three successful Supreme Court appointments.
However, there’s another reason why the partying should be slightly reserved, and Newt Gingrich put it nicely:
It would be hilarious if, after all the spitball flinging and elbow-bumping, it turns out Trump won, anyway. Not that I’m counting on it, but it would be a hoot, wouldn’t it?
In any case, a Biden presidency would be tolerable if he could be prevented from putting his worse policies into effect. Which would include, by the way, mandating facemasks for everyone leaving their home, and threatening fracking which would increase America’s dependence on foreign energy (but hey, Biden has been profiting off foreign energy, so at least he gets off well).
It’s tempting to end with the quip “You get what you vote for”, but we probably actually didn’t. We all know they had no intention of letting us have it our way. While that’s not anything new, what’s worse is the potential precedent this sets: the new approach where you call someone racist until you win.
It’s the 5th of November again (at least, it still is where I am). It’s a day that’s significant for certain web communities, which has to do with how much they like the movie V for Vendetta, which features a mysterious character in a Guy Fawkes mask. The character’s mysterious appeal has endeared him to the web group, Anonymous, who has used him as a sort of mascot character.
While the character from the movie might be interesting, the historical figure of Guy Fawkes is one whose ideals would easily conflict with those of Anonymous. If they were to learn about him, they may even wish to seek out a different spokesman.
Guy Fawkes was a Catholic terrorist who wanted to blow up the British parliament building so that he could help usher in a Catholic theocracy in the UK. His plot was thwarted, and Guy Fawkes was sentenced to be executed, though he would attempt to commit suicide in an effort to escape that outcome.
It’s for this reason the British recognize the 5th of November as the day Guy Fawkes was defeated, and they even developed a nursery rhyme to commemorate the occasion:
Remember, remember, the Fifth of November Gunpowder treason and plot I see no reason why gunpowder treason Should ever be forgot
That’s the basic form. There are more lyrics, some of which are quite scathing. One would get the idea that the British didn’t view him as a hero, at all.
One could ask Anonymous to pick a new spokesman. But if they did, they’d probably manage to scrape up one that’s somehow even worse.
But there are some winners among the possibilities.
Gap posted a tweet calling for unity amidst a divisive election. As part of this statement, Gap posted an image of a red and blue sweatshirt.
But then, under pressure from the Twitter mob, Gap took down the tweet. It seems like the Twitterati weren’t as interested in unity as Gap might have hoped.
You might notice something about the tweets that responded:
“I don’t think a zipped hoodie is going to cut it when everyone is this tired, broke, and scared,”
patient9five7 on Twitter
While there are broke people everywhere, leftists tend to be more outspoken about it.
“Sorry I’m not zipping myself to people who don’t believe I’m deserving of basic human rights,”
Allie_F on Twitter
Another common left-wing sentiment is that the right doesn’t believe certain people deserving of basic human rights, though this sentiment is born out of a mischaracterization of right-wing ideals.
Interestingly, the Twitter users who were the most outspoken about inequality between races and classes are the ones that seem the least interested in a message about unity.
Having spent plenty of time among right-wingers, I consider it safe to say that they’re not racist or classist, and what’s more, they are not characterized by divisiveness regarding race or class.
In fact, based on my observations, the right can largely be characterized by a desire to hold an open dialogue in a free-speech environment.
Rather than fighting, the right would prefer to take it easy. They’d be the ones who want to hang out, drink beer, and talk about things. You know, like normal people. But that’s hard to do when the other side is plugging up their ears and hurling the nastiest insults that someone else can imagine for them.
The right wants dialogue, and the left wants to shut down any discussion that isn’t their talking points. When the left shot down Gap’s call for unity, that really illustrated it well.
It’s been a couple days since Election Day, and we still don’t have results. But based on what we’ve seen so far, something seems suspicious.
For one thing, there are six states that still haven’t given us a definitive winner. Three of which happen to be important battleground states where Trump has an apparent lead. It might just be a coincidence, but it seems kind of odd that Pennsylvania, Georgia, and North Carolina have just a few percentage points more to go to reach their conclusion, and the three so happen to favor Trump. It so happens that all three happen to fall short of the same call, and the margins are about the same.
It’s almost as though they were somehow shy about declaring Trump the winner.
Of the other three, one is Nevada. While this one is showing a narrow Biden lead, the count has stalled at about three-quarters of the vote counted, and another is Alaska, whose votes have also stalled, but everyone seems to be ignoring them.
More suspicious still is that the state of Arizona was prematurely called for Biden, but votes have appeared that were still yet to be counted, from areas favoring Trump. These votes may be enough to flip the state in Trump’s favor, but the corporate media is ignoring it. In fact, they’re treating it as though it were the crown jewel of Biden’s victories.
Trump is expected to dispute some of the state results in court, and he might actually have a case. But if he goes that route, could you imagine the media storm surrounding it? We’d have court battles while both sides proclaim victory. And if Trump wins through the courts, it’s easy to imagine that we’d be given a treat in the form of legacy media attempting to use it to delegitimize a Trump reelection for four years.
Not that legacy media is doing a good job of maintaining its relevance, considering that they now mainly exist to prey on old people and the gullible.
It’s kind of like the 2000 election, except with a handful of states, not just one. As an American, I find it embarrassing. We fancy ourselves a shining beacon of how constitutional republics work, but we’re bad at determining the results of an election in one day. This in spite of the enthusiasm over mail-in ballots.
In the state of Pennsylvania, it was decided by the PA Supreme Court that mail-in ballots could be counted until Friday, even without a clear postmark. That’s spurious, considering that for votes to be valid, there needs to be a proper chain of custody. If there’s no postmark, can we be sure the votes passed through the postal service and not some shady individuals?
Polling has closed, and most of the votes have been counted, but Trump has a strong lead in the remaining battleground states, with the exception of Nevada, which leans Biden, and Wisconsin, which is close. Trump has taken the important state of Florida, a state which has sided with the winner of presidential elections since 1996.
Based on this information, Trump is on track to win the 2020 presidential election.
If you’re up for some amusing reading, go ahead and take a look at how traditional media is attempting to handle this. Their expectation of a clear, slam-dunk victory has just collided with reality, with the result being an impressive fragmented cloud of debris.
When comparing the offerings of the corporate mainstream information media with the reality that is right in front of the general population, I had suspected that these legacy information outlets are either doing a bad job of attempting to deceive us, or have spent so much time in their hermetically-sealed echo chambers that they have no idea what’s going on. In either case, it looks bad for them.
But in the context of this election, it’s even worse for the media, as it’s a referendum against them and their constant, obsessive attacks against President Trump, and their continual lies about “Russiagate”, and refusal to cover the story of Biden’s laptop, and the spurious connections the Biden family has with overseas energy companies (while the Bidens threaten US energy).
Of course, it’s also a referendum against social media’s abuse of power, and the Democrat’s callous response to the coronavirus with life-destroying shutdowns.
The race hasn’t been decided yet, but it’s strongly likely that Trump won. This is a phenomenon that the corporate media warned us about, calling it the red mirage, wherein an apparent Trump victory after election day can be challenged by mail-in votes that may turn the election to Biden. If that sounds suspicious, that’s because it comes off as an obvious attempt to cast doubt on the results, and tell the people not to believe their eyes.
We knew that they were going to pull this. But, vexingly, there isn’t much that ordinary people can do about it. Except, of course, continue to make the case to our parents and grandparents that legacy news outlets aren’t the same ones that they remembered from decades past, and are not to be trusted.
Regardless of who won, the free-speech and pro-constitutional elements of the intellectual dark web still have a lot of work ahead of them. This victory, if won, would be a significant step. But it wouldn’t mean that the Dark State wouldn’t try some other avenues to keep their plans in motion. If they’re effective strategists, they’ll have a backup plan, as should we.
